Subject:
|
Re: lugnet.duplo/toolo
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 27 Mar 1999 17:40:03 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
CJC@NEWSGUYstopspam.COM
|
Viewed:
|
1117 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote:
> However I'm not sure I support this naming convention. It's unwieldy.
> What do the extra prefixes really buy you, after all?
It'll mean I will never be able to cross-post using slrn. No way I'm
going to try to remember all those x.x.x.x.x.whatevers so I can type
them in manually.
Not everybody uses pretty little graphical clients with pull-down
menus of all the groups.
Heck, I've started referring to lugnet.market.auction as .auction -
how much confusion will there be if there are two .trains or
.mindstorms groups?
--
Lego Shop at Home: 800-835-4386 (USA) / 800-267-5346 (Canada)
www.lugnet.com/news/ - A great new resource for LEGO fans worldwide
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: lugnet.duplo/toolo
|
| (...) Some questions: Are you likely ever to want to crosspost between more than two of these groups at a time? How many groups are likely to crosspost to most often, and how likely are you to become familiar quickly with the names of these groups? (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: lugnet.duplo/toolo
|
| (...) Well, IMHO, if you decide to institute these groups using this prefixing, I'd argue that lulgnet.trains should be renamed to lugnet.lego.system.trains rather than there being two groups. Ditto for mindstorms, and for starwars for that matter (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
