To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 1214
1213  |  1215
Subject: 
Re: lugnet.duplo/toolo
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Sun, 28 Mar 1999 00:30:01 GMT
Viewed: 
6310 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> Todd Lehman wrote:
> > Abbreviations make typing easier/quicker but make memorization more
> > difficult.  In your mind, do the advantages of abbreviations (sys vs.
> > system, az vs. aquazone, ww vs. wildwest, etc.) outweigh the disadvantages
> > of not using abbreviations?
> 
> This wasn't addressed to me, but I think the disadvantage of unclarity
> of the abbreviations outweigh the advantage of brevity.  What I think
> there are is too many levels in the hierarchy.  Does system - for
> example - have to be included?

Maybe it doesn't need to be included as a physical category; maybe it could get
by as a virtual category for the sole purpose of "correct" organization of
official LEGO product programmes.

I'll have to consult the wonderful list Joshua made once upon a time (if I
can find it) to know for sure how much leeway there is.  For example,
LEGO DUPLO Trains and LEGO System Trains are parallel categories, which may
present a problem if 'system' is taken out.

But all things being equal, I sure would *like* to take out 'system' -- it's
confusing sometimes whether or not, for example, Belville and Fabuland are a
part of LEGO System (capital S) or whether they are their own systems.  (I
think TLG has flip-flopped on at least one of these at least once).

Certainly, it would be possible to have a category for LEGO System which
pointed to things which looked like subcategories but which were (technically)
sister-categories in newsgroup terms.

--Todd



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: lugnet.duplo/toolo
 
(...) This wasn't addressed to me, but I think the disadvantage of unclarity of the abbreviations outweigh the advantage of brevity. What I think there are is too many levels in the hierarchy. Does system - for example - have to be included? (28 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

14 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR