Subject:
|
Re: traffic page changes?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 Mar 2003 05:09:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
218 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> My big suggestion: Put the intro para at the top again, right now you're
> wasting a lot of horizontal space farther down below it. [...]
Ok, let's try that. Howzit now? I moved the text back up to the top and
also removed the bold title that I'd added yesterday.
> Or if you MUST have
> it on the side, blowing a column, at least when you resize the page, don't
> resize just that column... resize the others instead. They need the space
> more than it does.
>
> Thanks. Now I know why I like the old one better, I like the use of the
> colors to help the eye tell what is going on in the table. That and the
> overall layout just seems better. Change the font to Verdana if you want...
> that seems a good change I guess.
Verdana was the main change I wanted to make, but perhaps got a bit carried
away with simplification. How do you like it now? It uses #F0F0F0 and
#E0E0E0 for backgrounds and a #B0B0B0 for the box borders. This feels like
a good compromise. I made the font bigger (SIZE="-1") again too.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: traffic page changes?
|
| This is a great, great compromise! Kudos! My only suggestion, other than this is way better than the gray version you have in the reply, is to align the "read once" paragraph to the edges of the three tables. Such as this: <table> <tr (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | Re: traffic page changes?
|
| (...) Big improvement, it behaves much more gracefully under resize now. (...) The font being bigger is a huge relief for me, I could not read the old one. I like this lots better. I have just one more suggestion and I'm done... lose the leading '.' (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: traffic page changes?
|
| (...) My big suggestion: Put the intro para at the top again, right now you're wasting a lot of horizontal space farther down below it. Or if you MUST have it on the side, blowing a column, at least when you resize the page, don't resize just that (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
