Subject:
|
Re: traffic page changes?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 Mar 2003 01:10:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
216 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> OK so it wasn't an inadvertant layout change, then... what was wrong with
> the old layout?
We've been getting rid of that old Times Roman and converting things over
gradually to Verdana over the years. It was also using drab brownish gray
colored table backgrounds that didn't really add anything graphic-design-wise.
I moved the introductory paragraph (that used to be at the top) over to the
left so that the actual content of the page could move up about 2 cm, and also
made the type in the intro paragraph smaller and lighter -- it's really only
something a person needs to read once.
> This one seems less polished somehow but without a side by side I can't
> quite put my finger on why.
Here's the old one:
http://news.lugnet.com/news/traffic/oldlayout.html
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: traffic page changes?
|
| (...) My big suggestion: Put the intro para at the top again, right now you're wasting a lot of horizontal space farther down below it. Or if you MUST have it on the side, blowing a column, at least when you resize the page, don't resize just that (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: traffic page changes?
|
| (...) OK so it wasn't an inadvertant layout change, then... what was wrong with the old layout? This one seems less polished somehow but without a side by side I can't quite put my finger on why. (22 years ago, 13-Mar-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
