 | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) First of all, one can try to get a receipt from the receivers mail program. This is certainly not fool proof, but if you get a receipt, the receiver has almost certainly seen at least the Subject of the mail. If you never get a receipt, you (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | |  | | Re: Legends of Todd
|
| (...) Again, I'm at work, and can't give this better attention until tonight if I get the chance, but: While this may be true in theory, it seems that many here **think** that the establishment is not interested in their opinions, and may feel (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | |  | | Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
|
| Quick note: I'm at work on lunch break, and can't give this the thought I want to word it as well as it should be... (...) Nobody's perfect, and everybody makes mistakes. I'm not sure if it constitues a TOU violation, as I'm not as well-versed in (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | |  | | Re: Posting Policy Changes
|
| (...) First, thank you for approving the change. Perhaps automation is in order for this, if at least for paid members? Maybe assign the duty of checking for this type of thing to a specific person? I find it rather odd I can change my posting setup (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | |  | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) True. If LUGENT's servers end up on a blacklist again, it would be everyone's problem. But while Kevin could (and probably should) ask his ISP to unblock Larry's server, I would doubt one user would actually make much of an impact on them. So (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | |  | | Re: LUGNET members association
|
| (...) Well, Lenny, Larry and I have had some conversations, especially when the LPRV was first formed, and he acknowledged that he felt that Admins should be held to a higher standard hat on, or hat off. So Larry beleives there should be a double (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)
| | |  | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) That's what I'm talking about! I didn't think of that idea, good workaround, thanks. (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | |  | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) Hmm, I think it's actually both peoples issue to solve. SPAM is a real problem, but I have seen several providers take a lazy way out. Remember when Lugnet was incorrectly put on SPAM black lists? If it was only Lugnet's responsibility to (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | |  | | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) Yes, honestly, I am. Not for me but for the other admins too. As I said, we had some situations in the past where emails (from other admins, NOT from me) went blocked or went lost and we, the admins, had no idea it happened. I agree that short (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | |  | | Email Setups (was: Re: Badgering emails)
|
| (...) I think this issue can be boiled down to: 1. Official LUGNET email messages need to come from "*@lugnet.com" reply-to. Resolution: Each admin sets reply-to in their email client. Timeframe: Immediate. 2. To avoid spamblockers and spoof (...) (21 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |