| |
In article <GA2rEJ.2u1@lugnet.com>,
Sybrand Bonsma <sbonsma@molphys.leidenuniv.nl> wrote:
> Thanks for this list Todd, it is really nice. Many shuttles in this list, but
> what I found stranger was the difference between above sets 497 and 928. Both
> refer to the same set, but there is some difference in rating. Does anybody
> have a good explanation for this?
It's probably similar to why the Toyota Corolla always got a higher rating
than the Geo Prism, even though they were the same car built in the same
factory-- people percieve "Toyotas" as better than "Geos".
I suspect that in this case, it's people percieve "foreign" sets as being
better than "domestic" sets, but that's making the assumption that Lugnet
is more US-centric than it probably is. Another possibility is US users don't
like the 928 as much as their counterparts in the rest of the world like
their 497s...
-JDF
--
J.D. Forinash ,-.
foxtrot@cc.gatech.edu ( <
The more you learn, the better your luck gets. `-'
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Top 50 LEGO sets of all time
|
| (...) <snip> (...) <snip> (...) Thanks for this list Todd, it is really nice. Many shuttles in this list, but what I found stranger was the difference between above sets 497 and 928. Both refer to the same set, but there is some difference in (...) (23 years ago, 12-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.general)
|
31 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
