 | | Re: 3416 ~ womens team
|
|
(...) done, thanks! (24 years ago, 24-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: 3416 ~ womens team
|
|
I post through a Outlook Express, so I can't really link to it. It was posted in lugnet.admin.database on March 25. The subject is 'Scans for DUPLO 1503, 1504, 1505, and 2444' If you can't find it, I'll fire up the old web browser and find the exact (...) (24 years ago, 24-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: 3416 ~ womens team
|
|
(...) we sometime miss stuff, or put it off and get sidetracked... if you could link to the message you posted it, I'm sure one of us will get to it... :) (24 years ago, 24-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: 3416 ~ womens team
|
|
I posted some scans of a few Duplo sets and they still haven't been posted. I assumed there was a bunch of stuff waiting to be updated, until seeing something added less than an hour after it was posted. Any chance the scans I posted can be added (...) (24 years ago, 24-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: 3416 ~ womens team
|
|
(...) OH MY! I think you just gave away a spolier about Episode II...! --Todd (24 years ago, 23-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 3416 ~ womens team
|
|
(...) It sure looks like Anakin in drag to me. eric (24 years ago, 23-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: 3416 ~ womens team
|
|
(...) The freckle-faced girl looks an awful lot like the Anakin Skywalker head from the Star Wars sets, though I don't have one in front of me right now to compare. Can anyone else corroborate this? Otherwise, the blonde hairpieces are really cool. (...) (24 years ago, 23-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: 3416 ~ womens team
|
|
Added, thanks. (...) (24 years ago, 23-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | 3416 ~ womens team
|
|
Hey Todd, I am not sure if this is the correct corner of Lugnet for this, but as far as I can tell it is, so....... I got the Womens team set #3416 at LL yesterday, I noticed it was not in the database so here is the info and scans I have: Part (...) (24 years ago, 23-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: McDonalds 1999 promo sets in set reference ?
|
|
(...) I've added these - sometime last week actually :) get adding :) JLB (24 years ago, 12-Apr-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.promo)
|
| |
| | Re: What set has the...
|
|
"Andreas Stabno" <similego@home.com> wrote in message news:GBBGMK.A2o@lugnet.com... (...) This set, 6450 could use a category like "Light ´n sound".. The yellow one in 6481 was easier to identify.. /Joakim (24 years ago, 7-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: More new pics of 2001 stuff
|
|
Please don't tell me that they are discontinuing traditional minifigs. Please. Mark (...) (24 years ago, 5-Apr-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: More new pics of 2001 stuff
|
|
To all, I did just noticed that the images I have downloaded from shop.lego.com/... a few days back have now been removed and can no longer be seen where I found them. Someone at TLC must have noticed the 'misupload' and taken the new images back (...) (24 years ago, 4-Apr-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.technic.bionicle, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: More new pics of 2001 stuff
|
|
(...) (24 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Re: More new pics of 2001 stuff (Lego transforms?!)
|
|
(...) Did anyone else notice that on the packaging for the adult dinosaurs they include pictures of other dinosaurs you can build with each set. But the pictures are heade by the term TRANSFORMS. This seems to me not only misleading but also a cheap (...) (24 years ago, 3-Apr-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.technic.bionicle)
|
| |
| | Re: More new pics of 2001 stuff
|
|
Interesting! I was just about to announce about the same new images. You can now find most of these new things directly on lego.com. Hm, maybe not directly on lego.com in front of your face, but somewhere on lego.com :) . I have done some searching (...) (24 years ago, 2-Apr-01, to lugnet.year.2001, lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.technic.bionicle) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Custom Created Set Reference
|
|
(...) Hmm, an interesting topic... One could get a good inventory by noticing that John Doe happens to have brought set GOB-1234 to Brickfest and then disassemble it to count the parts. Of course how you get it back together again is another (...) (24 years ago, 1-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Custom Created Set Reference
|
|
(...) No apology necessary, I think Todd and the others are talking in the general case. Your intent was, and remains, clear to me and I have no issues with it whatsoever. (...) Yes indeed, seems a good characterization/metric. ++Lar (24 years ago, 1-Apr-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Custom Created Set Reference
|
|
(...) As I've said in my more comprehensive reply: (URL) believe that a inventory is not very usefull for custom created set, and I had no intention to include inventories in a possible Custom Created Set Reference. I'm aware of the importance of (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Custom Created Set Reference
|
|
(...) secret. (My client yesterday is very concerned with protecting recipes for things...) Inasmuch as the particular parts used to comprise a model can be considered a recipe they can be protected by agreements with the individual users or (...) (24 years ago, 31-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
