Subject:
|
Re: Custom Created Set Reference
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Sun, 1 Apr 2001 03:05:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
181 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.database, Manfred Moolhuysen writes:
> In lugnet.admin.database, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > Since I include an inventory page in my instructions, the representation of
> > that inventory is copyrighted, yes [snip]
>
> As I've said in my more comprehensive reply:
> http://news.lugnet.com/admin/database/?n=1209
> I believe that a inventory is not very usefull for custom created set, and I
> had no intention to include inventories in a possible Custom Created Set
> Reference. I'm aware of the importance of copyright for these sets
> I think I caused the misunderstanding myself when I mentioned the word
> inventarisation in my original post. I didn't mean inventory here, but doing
> the research to find out what sets where around. I'm sorry for the confusion.
No apology necessary, I think Todd and the others are talking in the general
case. Your intent was, and remains, clear to me and I have no issues with it
whatsoever.
> > All that said, if someone was interested in cataloging all my sets and all
> > the sets of other non LEGO sources, I'd work with them. Gladly.
>
> Great. Do you feel that a undifferentiated, aproximate total piece count, as
> indication of the size of the set, would be permitable ?
Yes indeed, seems a good characterization/metric.
++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Custom Created Set Reference
|
| (...) As I've said in my more comprehensive reply: (URL) believe that a inventory is not very usefull for custom created set, and I had no intention to include inventories in a possible Custom Created Set Reference. I'm aware of the importance of (...) (23 years ago, 31-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
18 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
