Administrative : Search Results: suggest


Administrative / Search Results: suggest

Results 261 – 280 of 403.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: May-June 2000 Mania Magazine + World Club Mag
(...) Suprisingly (to me) identical even down to the page number! (style, font, everything). That ish carries the same page-numbering style all the way through. (...) Nope - just checked through it a second time and saw no other mention of LUGNET in (...) (25 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.170)

		Re: More spam (Was: VERY CHEAP SPACE SETS!)
FUT off-topic.debate In lugnet.admin.general, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> (...) To paraphrase a famous line from Rainman... "Hotmail Sucks" I briefly had a hotmail account (actually I still do I don't think they ever go away) until I got the (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.170)

		Re: Apology for my email by Kieran Brady
(...) Yet another argument for an "opt in" list. I'd gladly receive targeted, brief, occasional mail (NOT auction updates unless i request them, mind you, but announcements of upcoming auctions, sales, etc) from any responsible LEGO sellers that (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.space)

suggest
(score: 0.170)

		Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
I suggest that Todd give him a warning, in private, about sending spam. He could point out that posting reaches a wider audience, and he is more likely to gain customers. Paul Sinasohn (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)

suggest
(score: 0.169)

		Re: Group Charters (was:Re: Fabuland Auction Update 4)
(...) No, I said .loc.au was a was logical place, not that it was the right place. By "logical place" I mean that common sense might suggest that posting it there might make perfect sense (if someone was clueless about the T&C). (...) It's always (...) (25 years ago, 4-May-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)

suggest
(score: 0.169)

		Re: PW validation terms/labels
I find the labels a bit pejorative, as they impose your thinking on what level of security is appropriate on what should just be strength metrics. For example at setting 1 "lax" it fails passwords that I consider perfectly adequate for the risk (...) (25 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.169)

		Re: Group Charters (was:Re: Fabuland Auction Update 4)
(...) Wow, you nailed it! That's the feeling I'm beginning to get after reading recent messages from PeterC, PaulB, MarkH, ScottA, and others. To posit a question, how much harm would it do if all types of market traffic were allowed in .loc and (...) (25 years ago, 3-May-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)

suggest
(score: 0.169)

		Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
(...) If we're down to just three choices, suggest that each choice get its own submit button. That's faster even than a radio button, and WAY faster than the current drop down list. And that improves usability from a human factors perspective. Of (...) (25 years ago, 23-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.168)

		Re: Creating Lugent Rating Criteria
(...) I was just saying "neutral, excellent, way excellent" in reply to something as a means of clarification. We'd actually like to avoid any kind of qualitative judgment type words in the choices. By saying "Highlight" and "Spotlight" (assuming (...) (25 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.168)

		Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
I believe there is a problem that has already been addressed by several people, and that is that the ratings are too vague. If everyone is rating messages based on their own criteria, then we will never be able to use the information that is being (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.168)

		Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
(...) Well, since you asked, I thought I'd leave mine. (...) This change could be for the better. I was fine with the 100 scale (I think the 5 scale gives less acurate results) but it's good if it makes rating easier for people. Hopefully this will (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.168)

		Re: the latest news
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) members (...) eliminate (...) might (...) help? Yes. I would also suggest that some explanatory text (i.e. how ratings should be interpreted) be added to the rating histogram page itself. I think that some (...) (25 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.168)

		Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
(...) help -- (...) to (...) clear (...) I think the rating system, in a ideal world, is a great idea. However, this is not an ideal world. The trouble with the system is, as I see it, that not enough members are voting - and those who are voting (...) (25 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.168)

		Re: Regarding bulk orders: a proposal
(...) Ah yes, a posted periodic summary might help Brad. Suggest posting a message to .lego.direct asking Brad if it would help him or not help him. (Or write to him at his published address legodirect@lego.com and ask.) Only Brad knows what would (...) (25 years ago, 18-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general)

suggest
(score: 0.168)

		Re: New newsgroups for LEGO Direct and the LEGO Company
(...) ^^^...^^^ (...) As for the name of the newsgroup, I also would like to suggest (again) that the name include the word OFFICIAL. I think this would help to clear up most confusion about posting privleges, validity of messages, and the like. (...) (25 years ago, 17-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.167)

		Re: Auczilla XI
(...) Certainly don't want to stirr up trouble, but I would assume that this thread really doesn't belong outside of lugnet.market.auction (in some ways even more so than an actual auction announcement, because this has extremely little value to (...) (25 years ago, 17-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms) !

suggest
(score: 0.167)

		Re: auction vs non-auction double standard?
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) of (...) original (...) to (...) Perhaps something on the lines of: ---...--- Posts offering items for sale, trade, auction, or "wanted" posts, or anything else related to "market" type activities are (...) (25 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms) !

suggest
(score: 0.167)

		Re: LEGO Direct ng possibilities (was: Re: Cleaning up the main homepage)
(...) How about other terms being used? I might suggest: lugnet.lego-direct lugnet.lego-direct.official reserve posting privledges to LD representatives only; FUT defaul set at lugnet.lego-direct I also would like to suggest this lugnet.dear-lego (...) (25 years ago, 10-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

suggest
(score: 0.167)

		Re: New newsgroups for LEGO Direct and the LEGO Company
(...) Some more background and clarification (Important): This new .lego.* area (especially .lego.direct) is intended more as a "community dialogue with the LEGO Company -- for courteous and concise discussion" than as a regular traffic discussion (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general) !!

suggest
(score: 0.167)

		Re: auction vs non-auction double standard?
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) traffic (...) exist, (...) to (...) I think there is a "double standard" in that auction posts are singled out as particularly bad. This is not necessarily a bad thing (we also have a "double standard" on (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)

suggest
(score: 0.167)

More: Next Page >>