|
| |
|  
mail
(score: 1.219)
|
|
 | | Re: Wanted to buy - #6376 Breezeway Cafe
|
| (...) What is a reasonable policy to set for this? Either we have to require that people never 'lugnet' in their e-mail address as Mike has inadvertently done (I'm sure he meant no harm), or we could allow it but require a "not affiliated with in (...) (26 years ago, 7-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.218)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.218)
|
|
| | "Too many body parts"
|
| So I'm going the bounced-mail folder here this morning, deciding if any of these represent defunct enough errors to delete anyone from a mailing list, and I had to chuckle at this message below... (I replaced the real address@aol.com with (...) (25 years ago, 29-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.218)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.218)
|
|
| | Re: lugnet.cad hierarhcy
|
| (...) Days, weeks, months, or years? (...) Not necessarily disagreeing, but isn't it likely that a developer who cares about these issues would read the other groups, and that a developer who does not care about these issues would ignore the issues (...) (25 years ago, 15-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.218)
|
|
| | Re: A tiresome tirade (Was: garbage output)
|
| (...) I blew my top after carefully thinking about it and noting that others seemed to be unwilling or too nice to blow theirs. The e-mail I received from several people after that agreeing with what I said makes me think it was a Good Thing to do. (...) (26 years ago, 11-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.218)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.217)
|
|
| | Re: posting failure?
|
| (...) Well, what I wrote above in February was not entirely correct. It is necessary (at least on this system) to FLUSH the socket's buffer when it becomes full. I am not very knowledgeable about sockets in Perl, and it's not a well-documented area, (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.217)
|
|
| | Mutilated DAT-file
|
| On April 12th 1999 I've posted a Dat-file to lugnet.cad.dat@lugnet.com with the mail program MS Outlook Express. The subject was: [Newpart] - #2871, Electric Train 9V Motor Decorative Side Somewhere during the process a big chunk of 85 consecutive (...) (25 years ago, 19-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.217)
|
|
| | Re: A tiresome tirade (Was: garbage output)
|
| Todd: [...] (...) That feels just like when kids refer to me as "the man". ;-( (...) I must admit that I haven't (cared to?) read all JW's posts on Lugnet, but from the ones I have read it appears that he has a different attitude to LDraw parts (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.217)
|
|
| | Re: A tiresome tirade (Was: garbage output)
|
| (...) Sorry, I didn't mean it like that. (Not that there's anything wrong with being old.) By "elders" I just meant "old-timers" or "well-versed participants" in the sense of people who have been around the group for a long time and know the ins and (...) (25 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.217)
|
|
| | Re: A tiresome tirade (Was: garbage output)
|
| Todd: (...) I know. That is the difference between ":-(" and ";-(". The latter one should probably be followed by a plain smiley, but I'm not good at ASCII animations. (...) I will. [ ... ] (...) This sounds like a good solution if we find it (...) (25 years ago, 13-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.217)
|
|
| | Re: lugnet.trains.org newsgroup?
|
| (...) I understand that concern. Here are some things to think about though -- Current traffic levels aren't really very accurate predictors of future traffic levels after a split. You might have 50 posts/day in some group and then after a split it (...) (25 years ago, 15-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.trains)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.217)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.217)
|
|
| | Re: lugnet.trains.org newsgroup?
|
| Larry Pieniazek: (...) Difficult to tell, but critical mass isn't much of a metric here as it is on Usenet, mainly because groups are archived and easily past-browseable and because it is so easy to create new groups and receive them as mailing (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.trains)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.217)
|
|
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.217)
|
|
| | Re: lugnet.trains.org newsgroup?
|
| I totally agree with Dan on the club's mission... but I think that club members from the same or different clubs can use .train to discuss train club stuff. After all it is all about LEGO trains. Would anyone object to a conversation about how to (...) (25 years ago, 15-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.trains)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.217)
|
|
| | Re: Suggestion for emails
|
| (...) (See below...) (...) What e-mail software are you using that causes this? (...) If you receive the groups in digest form rather than regular-message form, then you'll see something like this at the top of the digest message: X-Digest-Archive: (...) (25 years ago, 30-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
mail
(score: 1.216)
|
|
| | New Primo/Duplo sets for the Database
|
| Hi, while doing some hocus-pocus with czech catalogs, I noticed that few sets are missing on Lugnet, mostly in Primo/Duplo themes. The following info is in this format: ---cut here--- set number theme, {faked name, roughly translated from czech (...) (20 years ago, 2-May-04, to lugnet.admin.database)
| |
|
service
(score: 1.216)
|
