To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / Search Results: internet mail service
 Results 781 – 800 of about 2200.
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: My Stance
 
Lorbaat wrote in message ... (...) it's (...) felt (...) two (...) LEGO (...) do we (...) can (...) As (...) people (...) exist. (...) and (...) never (...) (trust (...) people (...) the (...) full (...) of (...) find a (...) pain (...) internet. (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

internet
(score: 0.342)

  Re: My Stance
 
(...) Matt, You're going to take this as some kind of slam, or some kind of flame, but it's not intended as one, really. Try to keep that in mind as you read it. I've read pretty much every post resulting from your initial posts of a few days ago. I (...) (24 years ago, 20-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

internet
(score: 0.342)

  Re: My Stance
 
(...) Well, theres a start. An apology is only part of the act of contrition... one must strive to be better. Regarding emotions...I generally have the emotional range of a turnip, but that does not mean I can be offensive, callous, insensitive, and (...) (24 years ago, 19-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

internet
(score: 0.342)

  Re: My point.
 
(...) D'oh! I forgot my own footnote. [1] I was there to flame. I enjoy flaming people. I don't think it's a big crime, especially if you keep it to places where it's appropriate, such as alt.usenet.kooks, alt.flame, ne.internet.services (circa (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
 

internet
(score: 0.342)

  Re: Spam alert!
 
I have been reading many messages lately about email address being pulled out of newsgroups. I have to kick in my two cents here, because this is driving me nuts. Newsgroup email harvesting has been happening since the creation of newsgroups. You (...) (24 years ago, 18-Oct-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au)
 

internet
(score: 0.342)

  Re: Rebirth of Cool LEGO Site of the Week
 
(...) of the most frustrated person to see it disappear! Anyway, here are some ideas of my own: Format: I think it should be based on the rating of the site, rather than a voting system as it was before. People, probably only Lugnet members, could (...) (22 years ago, 3-Jul-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 

mail
(score: 0.341)

  Re: Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
 
(...) control. (...) no (...) Correction...What I meant was that most/all companies have no need to allow employees access to the internet. Maybe some want to try and entice people using the internet to buy their products by having a website, but (...) (24 years ago, 12-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 

internet
(score: 0.341)

  Re: why no ".dat" email digests?...
 
(...) (not Suz or Todd, but...) Steve has the right of it. I'm e-mail subscribed to loc.ca, but I do not see any messages in any of the various loc.ca.foo groups. This is IMO, a good thing. thanks, James (22 years ago, 24-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 0.340)

  Re: Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
 
(...) How would you explain that your message just now (which I'm replying to) appears properly threaded? (...) Actually, it is. See RFC822 "Standard for the Format of ARPA Internet Text Messages" and RFC1138, RFC1148, RFC1327 and RFC2156. (...) (...) (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 

internet
(score: 0.340)

  Re: Noncompliant software (was: Re: Incorrect group posting)
 
(...) Beg all you want. You can't deny responsibility. You've been told what not to do, if you persist in doing it, you're responsible. Therefore you have control. (...) No company "has little or no need to use the internet". Not if it wants to (...) (24 years ago, 11-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
 

internet
(score: 0.340)

  Re: why no ".dat" email digests?...
 
(...) Because 'lugnet.cad.dat' is retired, inactive, no-longer-in-existence. Unless I misunderstand news-by-mail, you only get messages for groups you specifically subscribe to, not all the subgroups under the specific groups. Steve (22 years ago, 24-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 0.340)

  why no ".dat" email digests?...
 
I've tried getting "lugnet.cad.dat" via email (digest) on the "Subscriptions" page ("(URL) I've _never_ gotten any messages for ".dat"... Why? Thanks, Franklin (22 years ago, 23-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 0.340)

  subscription page won't remember my confirmation code...
 
I'm a member of LUGNet ("(URL) I'm usually "signed in" on my parent's PC (i.e., LUGNet remembers my member ID and password). And yet, LUGNet does _not_ remember my "confirmation code" on the "Subscriptions" page ("(URL) (22 years ago, 23-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

mail
(score: 0.340)

  Re: Group in Subject: Header for News-by-Mail
 
(...) I suppose I've never thought about actually using mail to *reply* to news. . .yes, it would look really ugly if a user did that, and yes, a user would do that. . . (...) And potentially it could do bad things (probably not, but things have a (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 

mail
(score: 0.340)

  Re: offline building instructions...
 
(...) Cool! Welcome to LUGNET, the friendliest place on the internet. Just watch out for certain characters who have unrealistic expectations of how fast TLC can change. If one of them challenges you, my advice is to ignore him or her. So, what's a (...) (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
 

internet
(score: 0.340)

  Group in Subject: Header for News-by-Mail
 
I suggest that there be an optional feature for those reading LUGNET by mail to have the name of the newsgroup appear in the Subject: line, in the usual fashion. That is, Subject: [lugnet.admin.suggestions] Re: Curator List so users could tell right (...) (22 years ago, 13-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 

mail
(score: 0.340)

  Re: LUGNET Memberships
 
(...) That was when, yes, according to my records. (...) But you said in that form that Dylan Bradley was your real-life name. I would appreciate any thoughts you could offer as to how to make it clearer to people that "real-life name" means (...) (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)  
 

internet
(score: 0.340)

  Re: LUGNET Memberships
 
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G20t6H.4us@lugnet.com... (...) news:G1zGDI.4Iy@lugnet.com... (...) is (...) addresses (...) show (...) membership (...) I, too, am wondering that <g>... (...) That was inside the membership (...) (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

internet
(score: 0.340)

  Re: Curator List
 
(...) Yes. It's a good idea, especially for emphasizing groups that would most benefit from some attention. That *open* link could appear on the group's page itself too. We can do that once there's a curator FAQ of some kind for interested parties (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.curators)
 

mail
(score: 0.340)

  Re: Question: Why allow postings of lego.direct on lugnet at all?
 
(...) I would point out that currently posting any market posting other than an auction posting anywhere within Lugnet is not against the TOS. It is against the clear desires and directions of the admins and the community (so a post or e-mail asking (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jun-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.terms)
 

mail
(score: 0.340)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR