Subject:
|
Re: why no ".dat" email digests?...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 Jun 2002 23:58:00 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
278 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Franklin W. Cain writes:
> > Unless I misunderstand news-by-mail, you only get messages
> > for groups you specifically subscribe to, not all the subgroups
> > under the specific groups.
>
> That's weird, I was thinking it's the exact _opposite_.
> (In fact, I've arranged my subscriptions based on this premise,
> that I need only the upper-level groups, that the lower-level
> groups will be included...)
>
> Suz, Todd, which way is correct?
(not Suz or Todd, but...) Steve has the right of it. I'm e-mail subscribed
to loc.ca, but I do not see any messages in any of the various loc.ca.foo
groups.
This is IMO, a good thing.
thanks,
James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: why no ".dat" email digests?...
|
| (...) Todd and/or Suz, If this is so --(Is it?)-- then I'd like to have a feature added to the email subscriptions page, whereby I can _choose_ to subscribe to a group _and_ all of its subgroups as one digest... Please? Thanks, Franklin (22 years ago, 25-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: why no ".dat" email digests?...
|
| (...) That's weird, I was thinking it's the exact _opposite_. (In fact, I've arranged my subscriptions based on this premise, that I need only the upper-level groups, that the lower-level groups will be included...) Suz, Todd, which way is correct? (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
