Subject:
|
Re: Suz Q&A was:[Why the absence of LD in their own newsgroup?]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 25 Jun 2002 02:27:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3365 times
|
| |
|
|
In article <Gy8986.JJK@lugnet.com>,
"richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote:
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> > > How does your status inform your views about TLC's level of participation
> > > and the future of Lugnet in relation to TLC?
> > I'm not entirely sure what I can say to this question really.. can you
> > rephrase or elabarate?
>
> I guess I meant: what did you learn from being on the *inside* that informs
> your attitudes about the company overall and/or how to deal with them?
>
> > I'm afraid what you mean is not TLC, but LD. My status and history with TLC
> > has no real bearing on that of LUGNET's with LD. But, I suppose the things I
> > know about -do- build a certain picture.
>
> I'm not sure why the parent company has no relationship to the question, but
> I think we'd like to see an answer concerning your overall impressions of
> the company and where it is going, how they handle business relationships,
> etc.
>
> What is that "certain picture"?
>
> > singled out among..?
> > > Do you feel constrained in ways that others are not?
> > 'others' being...?
>
> I just meant other websites dedicated to Lego. Brickshelf, FBTB, Brickset,
> etc. I wondered if you felt that Lugnet was treated unfairly in some way.
>
> Just tell us what you think. Maybe all that is needed is a statement about
> Lugnet's future and intended direction, as both a property belonging to you
> and Todd and as a community resource. Just answering that might be hard
> enough.
>
> Note: I originally wrote these questions as just general points of interest
> concerning the earlier firestorm of controversy (and that as a kind of
> defense of your apparent attitude absent better information) and not as some
> formal list of interrogatories -- in the main, if you have thoughts you
> think you could share with the lugnet community now might be a good time to
> share them. It is not my purpose to try and gain disclosures from you that
> you do not wish to make, or even to engage you in a conversation that you
> don't want to participate in.
>
> -- Hop-Frog
Why are all these kinds posts in lugnet.lego.direct? Does anyone expect
Lego Direct to comment here? (or in similar posts).
Of the groups that I follow, and I only follow a few (.trains,
.trains.org, .cad.mlcad, and .cad.dev.mac), this is one of the most off
topic groups.
I remember when the the LUGNET admins asked us to keep the chatter down,
but it seems like it is still too noisy in lugnet.lego.direct.
Chris
--
remove *nogarbageplease*. to e-mail me
Do you see these anomalies in OS X too?
http://homepage.mac.com/cjmasi/osx-issues/os_x_issues.htm
|
|
1 Message in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
