Subject:
|
Re: why no ".dat" email digests?...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 Jun 2002 21:35:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
277 times
|
| |
|
|
> Unless I misunderstand news-by-mail, you only get messages
> for groups you specifically subscribe to, not all the subgroups
> under the specific groups.
That's weird, I was thinking it's the exact _opposite_.
(In fact, I've arranged my subscriptions based on this premise,
that I need only the upper-level groups, that the lower-level
groups will be included...)
Suz, Todd, which way is correct?
Thanks,
Franklin
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: why no ".dat" email digests?...
|
| (...) (not Suz or Todd, but...) Steve has the right of it. I'm e-mail subscribed to loc.ca, but I do not see any messages in any of the various loc.ca.foo groups. This is IMO, a good thing. thanks, James (22 years ago, 24-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: why no ".dat" email digests?...
|
| (...) Because 'lugnet.cad.dat' is retired, inactive, no-longer-in-existence. Unless I misunderstand news-by-mail, you only get messages for groups you specifically subscribe to, not all the subgroups under the specific groups. Steve (22 years ago, 24-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
