Administrative : Search Results: internet mail service


Administrative / Search Results: internet mail service

Results 1621 – 1640 of 2225.

Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Thread Marking, news-by-mail?
As I don't read every message in LUGNET, there are sometimes interesting threads in groups that I don't check regularly and I miss out because of that. I imagine that building a web-interface mechanism for tracking individual threads would be heavy (...) (24 years ago, 3-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 0.238)

		Re: Thread Marking, news-by-mail?
(...) Yahoo isn't that smart, it's only got 3megs of space and setting up individual filters for each thread is much harder than clicking a "subscribe to thread" button on the web-interface. But yeah - I could do that if I wasn't so lazy :) Richard (24 years ago, 3-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 0.238)

		Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
(...) No, I think the key phrase here is "unsolicited COMMERCIAL e-mail". Cheers, - jsproat (24 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 0.238)

		Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
(...) Well I'm not one for me too posts but ME TOO. I got this E-mail to and it is fairly obvious you more than likely got the E-mails from either LUGNET (Most Likely) or Ebay. Seeing I don't use RTL he would not have seen my E-mail their and while (...) (24 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)

mail
(score: 0.238)

		Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
(...) Well I think this is a good point maybe the statement should read more like this.. (Using Larry's statement as a starting point) "Sending unsolicited BULK e-mail using addresses obtained via any unapproved mechanism on LUGNET is a TOS (...) (24 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 0.238)

		Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
(...) He's not a rude guy. I have bought some Lego from him in the past and the deal went very well. He's giving a real offer and I'm keeping his mail in case there's something I want. If you don't trust his offer and are not interested, then (...) (24 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)

mail
(score: 0.238)

		Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
(...) I like this idea. I really hope the marketting world starts to realize the value of targetted advertising. I would happily fill out a fairly detailed survey if I felt that it's use would be to make sure I received only mail I am interested in. (...) (24 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

mail
(score: 0.238)

		Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
(...) I would personally find it more annoying and rude than if I had recieved junk-mail through the post or telephone solitication. If it is fine for one person to do that - then what happens when ten other people start doing it? Does that mean (...) (24 years ago, 4-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 0.238)

		Re: Fair use of lugnet.cad.dat
(...) Well, it's that "worth looking at" specification that's really arbitrary. :-, Especially with a couple of my models I'm pretty embarassed about... (...) Now that's tempting! You see, my HD at home is a little lacking in space now that I've (...) (26 years ago, 25-Feb-99, to lugnet.admin.general)

internet
(score: 0.238)

		Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
(...) Same here. (...) Indeed. And the recipient list is not displayed, right? (...) It may have been unwanted but I don't think it's rude. He says he's started a small business to sell Lego. Let him, I for one couldn't care less he sent me such a (...) (24 years ago, 4-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)

mail
(score: 0.238)

		Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
(...) it (...) immoral (...) I agree 100%. I simply responded to his message when it came to my newsguy address and asked him to remove my address, although I know for a fact I have never done business with him before. When it showed up at my (...) (24 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)

mail
(score: 0.238)

		Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
(...) My issue isn't whether he's a good trader. I didn't ask to trade with him, and I don't have the interest. I don't care if he's a good trader. No, my issue is with his incredible lack of tact in resorting to spam to further his business. If he (...) (24 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)

mail
(score: 0.238)

		RE: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
On a similar note, has anyone received spam from any of the following? makemoney838458585@b...stra.co.id cablenews4u@bigfoot.com wtr3@aol.com suzan235499@bellsouth.com gft6@aol.com cdnames@flashmail.com The only place I've e-mailed has been LUGNET, (...) (24 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)

mail
(score: 0.238)

		New newsgroup lugnet.admin.nntp
A new group/list for NNTP[1]-related issues has just been created. Probably, you'll just want to ignore it unless you're writing a streaming news client or having difficulties getting your newsreader to do something. CHARTER/PURPOSE ===...=== -> (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.announce)

mail
(score: 0.238)

		Re: neither sponsored nor endorsed by the LEGO Company? (was : Re: an update -- and an apology)
(...) We hope to change the text on the homepage as soon as we have more information from Brad and his counsel/attorney(s) about exactly what the donation means in his mind. His letter which accompanied the donation mentioned that it was "made with (...) (24 years ago, 3-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.dear-lego)

mail
(score: 0.238)

		(canceled)

mail
(score: 0.237)

		Re: membership question
(...) Do you mean with respect to news-posting setup? i.e., (URL) with respect to membership? i.e., (URL) We would also like to sign up both of ours boys, aged 4 and 4 months, but (...) No, it's not dependent on unique email addresses. In fact, (...) (24 years ago, 27-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 0.237)

		Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
(...) I like + over , but unless the !'s font is darker, it's worthless to me. I have fairly good eyes, but I can barely even see that the article is rated. Again, I introduce you to Mr. Dead Horse...Why not use 1-5 instead of !-!!!!!, -*****, (...) (24 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 0.237)

		Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful?
(...) "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all". Gee thanks for reminding us Mom...er..Todd. ;) Ben Roller (24 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 0.237)

		Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
(...) Well, since you asked, I thought I'd leave mine. (...) This change could be for the better. I was fine with the 100 scale (I think the 5 scale gives less acurate results) but it's good if it makes rating easier for people. Hopefully this will (...) (24 years ago, 21-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 0.237)

More: Next Page >>