Administrative : Search Results: internet mail service


Administrative / Search Results: internet mail service

Results 1181 – 1200 of 2225.

Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
(...) Well I agree that LUGNET is a public forum and that is why he should have posted here. I am sorry but my E-mail is not a public forum for people to send me unwanted E-mail. Also he may be a good dealer but that doesn't mean I want his E-mail. (...) (24 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)

mail
(score: 1.168)

		Re: LUGNET getting too complex?
(...) I imagine that when Todd gets around to making the web site able to keep track of which messages you've read, this feature will be available there too. But I don't think that's going to be available for a while. :( (This is one of many reasons (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 1.168)

		Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
All, It seems at this point that the article rating feature -- intended to help -- is actually causing more harm than good to the community. It's difficult to gauge how much harm is being done when opinions are so varied, but it's clear that (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.general, lugnet.announce) !!

mail
(score: 1.168)

		Re: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful? (was: New feature: Article rating)
In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes: snip,snip,snip... (...) That's probably a good idea (it doesn't worry me) for the sensitive, but people will always be tempted to look at their 'mark' and get upset. (...) I think the rating system has a (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 1.168)

		What should be done about ratings (Was: Opinions wanted: article rating harmful?)
Before I start this message is a response to (URL) have very rarely used the Lugnet News web-interface so I did a little research on the rating system. After twiddling around in the web-based version I discovered that some fundamental issues need to (...) (24 years ago, 20-Apr-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 1.168)

		Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
(...) I'm of two minds here. I totally agree with Eric, and yet I wasn't personally bothered by the mail from Helge, rather I welcomed it. Perhaps in the far future the following facilities will all be available on Lugnet: (read the Plan, it hints (...) (24 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)

mail
(score: 1.167)

		Re: More spam (Was: VERY CHEAP SPACE SETS!)
(...) each (...) EVERYONE (...) If you live in the U.S., why yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. If you live in a house and you don't have posted, "No Soliciting", anyone is welcome to come up to the door and knock and ask you to buy something, (...) (24 years ago, 12-May-00, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 1.167)

		Re: Improper threading
Just wondering...When I post a message by e-mail, it includes the basic e-mail header of the message I'm replying to. Would it be possible for the program on LUGNET that puts these messages to look at this header info and attempt to put it in where (...) (24 years ago, 28-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 1.167)

		New newsgroup lugnet.admin.nntp
A new group/list for NNTP[1]-related issues has just been created. Probably, you'll just want to ignore it unless you're writing a streaming news client or having difficulties getting your newsreader to do something. CHARTER/PURPOSE ===...=== -> (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-00, to lugnet.admin.nntp, lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.announce)

mail
(score: 1.167)

		Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
(...) Well I'm not one for me too posts but ME TOO. I got this E-mail to and it is fairly obvious you more than likely got the E-mails from either LUGNET (Most Likely) or Ebay. Seeing I don't use RTL he would not have seen my E-mail their and while (...) (24 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)

mail
(score: 1.167)

		Re: Gladiator (spoilers)
(...) That didn't work. How about: asdflkjlaksdjflk;jar...lhgsd;hkj; dhgs;jhdgs;hsdgal;hg...k;sdg;jhad g;kjhgsdk;jskd;jhagk...sdgkjhsdjg k;sjkd;hgajk;hgasd;h...fhk;jhksfd ;jhksf;jhgsdf;jhgd;g...;hsjdf;jhk sdf;jfhds;kjhasd;kjh...asd;fai;ow (24 years ago, 15-May-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 1.167)

		Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
(...) He's not a rude guy. I have bought some Lego from him in the past and the deal went very well. He's giving a real offer and I'm keeping his mail in case there's something I want. If you don't trust his offer and are not interested, then (...) (24 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)

mail
(score: 1.167)

		Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
Hi all, A message from the offender... I am truly sorry if I have caused any inconvenience for anybody, or offended anyone. This was the first time a sent out a mail to multiple persons like this, and I now realise that it was not a very good idea. (...) (24 years ago, 6-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)

mail
(score: 1.167)

		Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
(...) No, I think the key phrase here is "unsolicited COMMERCIAL e-mail". Cheers, - jsproat (24 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 1.167)

		Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
(...) I would personally find it more annoying and rude than if I had recieved junk-mail through the post or telephone solitication. If it is fine for one person to do that - then what happens when ten other people start doing it? Does that mean (...) (24 years ago, 4-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 1.167)

		Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
(...) and (...) it (...) immoral (...) What about having the tackt to let me now directly that this was not the way of doing things ? Or at least inform me that you had put a negative posting on Lugnet ? I did not see this discussion until today - (...) (24 years ago, 6-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)

mail
(score: 1.167)

		Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
(...) One message from Larry is "all hell"? Tempest/teapot. Mountain/molehill. Though AFTER your post, a pale rider on a pale horse trotted by followed by with his entourage, which I suppose qualifies. :-) (...) I must say that I regard the (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

service
(score: 1.167)

		Re: Bye, bye LUGNET
(...) The current process is unweildy, but it's what we've got now. This issue, among others, is helping to define what the policy and process should be rather than what they are right now. But as it stands, that's what it is, and that's what we (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

service
(score: 1.167)

		Re: wish's - Contest canceled
In lugnet.admin.general, Tim Courtney wrote: <snip> (...) Dave, Don't and not cancel each other out so what you get is "I'm strongly advocating for you to *be( stopped as well as posting this in public either." Sticking to issues not people, I find (...) (20 years ago, 4-Mar-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

service
(score: 1.167)

		Re: WARNING: spam from Helge Viker
(...) Well I think this is a good point maybe the statement should read more like this.. (Using Larry's statement as a starting point) "Sending unsolicited BULK e-mail using addresses obtained via any unapproved mechanism on LUGNET is a TOS (...) (24 years ago, 5-May-00, to lugnet.admin.general)

mail
(score: 1.167)

More: Next Page >>