|
| |
|  
communication
(score: 0.681)
|
|
 | | multiplexing Spybot inputs?
|
| It occurred to me that one might fit some sort of light sensors on top of some of the six LEDs on the Spybot's top side, and use this to select an input channel to route information from any of a number of sensors to the VLL sensor. Has anybody (...) (20 years ago, 3-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics.spybotics, FTX)
| |
|
spybot
(score: 0.681)
|
|
| | WinLNP
|
| Hi, I downloaded the WinLNP and set it up, but i can´t make a communication beetewn the the IR Tower and RCX. Some of you could connect it? Thank you (24 years ago, 12-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
rcx, communication
(score: 0.681)
|
|
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
| (...) I can't speak for the NXT, but knowing that it has BT, and should be adhering to the specs, then the answer would be yes. The master-slave communication is coordinated via time slots within a piconet. This would avoid message collisions. In (...) (19 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.681)
|
|
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
| (...) I am not certain but I believe that the NXT does not allow direct slave-slave communication. An NXT can be both a master and a slave in a hierarchical array of NXTs (to the best of my knowledge) but two slave NXTs cannot directly communicate (...) (19 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.681)
|
|
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.681)
|
|
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
| (...) OK...it looks like this messaging mechanism in (URL) is a little confusing. Steve cleared this up a bit in (URL) In the hierarchy he discussed, N0 has to go through N1 to talk to N2-4. This model can be extended to higher levels in a tree (...) (19 years ago, 5-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.681)
|
|
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.681)
|
|
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
| (...) Yes just kinda murky now! There are still good opportunities for a wireless network of NXT's! One could write a program on a single master and control as many lower level NXT's as you could bring together! Like one general commanding three (...) (19 years ago, 5-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.680)
|
|
| |
|
spybot
(score: 0.680)
|
|
| |
|
spybot
(score: 0.680)
|
|
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
| (...) I can't figure out a easy way for me to test PC-to-NXT timelag, but I tried some simple bench tests on NXT-to-NXT. This is just the old standard of two timed loops (10,0000 interations), one empty, and one with a single block (or two), and (...) (19 years ago, 5-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.680)
|
|
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
| (...) Hey Ross, With bluetooth built in, there is no real need for any other kind of brick to brick communication to be investigated. Bluetooth is a professional strength protocol with all the necessary networking features. Since it uses gobs of (...) (19 years ago, 3-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.680)
|
|
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.680)
|
|
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.680)
|
|
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
| (...) Ok after actually reading the other threads in this post, it looks like TLG decided to develop its own BT profile just for the NXT. The messaging mechanism described by Brian and Steve looks like it will allow direct slave-slave communication, (...) (19 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.680)
|
|
| |
|
spybot
(score: 0.680)
|
|
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.680)
|
|
| | Re: NXT to NXT communication?
|
| (...) John Barnes and others have been working on that. He has out a beta of a "Nxt Byte Code" (NBC) assembler, and he's dug into a *lot* of firmware and software details. See the following (& John's website) for more details. (URL) not as sure (...) (19 years ago, 4-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.680)
|
|
| |
|
communication
(score: 0.680)
|
