LUGNET News : Search Results: pieniazek


Search Results: pieniazek

Results 701 – 720 of about 16000.

Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Badgering emails
(...) I agree. I'd give it high priority once coding resumes in a major way, but it's not there yet. (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 0.353)

		Re: Badgering emails
(...) There's no faulting flowing from this direction, merely a statement that there's a problem at the user's end. (...) Sorry, why not? I'm not clear on that really. If a user has a malformed or malfunctioning mail, why isn't that the user's issue (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 0.353)

		Re: LUGNET members association
(...) Well, as long as it was Scott, it was easy enough to disregard. It was just Scott, after all, noted button pusher. But when we get this mistrust from people we used to respect before they wigged out, or people we still do want to respect for (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, FTX)

pieniazek
(score: 0.353)

		Re: Badgering emails
(...) OK. But it isn't set up NOW, is it? If so, what then? (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 0.353)

		Re: Badgering emails
(...) Yes. However the LUGNET server doesn't currently have the capabilty to send (originate) mail, does it? That was how I read what you said before. In that case, if it's true that it can't, what then? (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 0.353)

		Curatorship of lugnet.trains
If you're interested in being a co-curator of the lugnet.trains hierarchy please drop me a line. Thanks. (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.trains)

pieniazek
(score: 0.353)

		Re: Posting Policy Changes
(...) I've been so busy reading all the posts saying what a terrible person I am and how everything I do is bad for LUGNET that I haven't had a chance to do approvals for a few days, and it looks like I'm the only person that seems to do them. (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 0.353)

		Re: Badgering emails
(...) Not necessarily. LUGNET does not have this ability, as I understand it. It is possible to construct an email that shows the "from:" as being from a lugnet.com email address, but, again, as I understand it, not to have the email actually be (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 0.353)

		Re: Badgering emails
(...) Whatever. But the issue remains, whose responsibility is it to ensure email communication works? LUGNET and the LUGNET admins? Or the user? This issue has come up before and while the admins will do what they can, it's not their responsibility (...) (19 years ago, 24-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 0.353)

		Re: Badgering emails
(...) That's not accurate. What IS accurate is that when I discovered there was a problem, I talked to my support and based on what they told me then, I said to you that the problem was at your end. Later on, you insinuated that I was deliberately (...) (19 years ago, 24-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 0.353)

		Re: Slug Photos
(...) I heard they are not as popular now because the savings aren't worth the loss in flexibility (just like cabless locos aren't as common either any more). (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.trains)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		The light touch (was Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
(...) OK, to clarify, in your opinion, are you saying this particular clause of the ToU should not be enforced at all? Or just not in this particular case with respect to this particular post? If not at all, why not? It's really a hot button with (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		(canceled)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
(...) I'm not going to reply in detail (although there is stuff I agree with and stuff I disagree with...) Instead, I'm going to ask you how you would handle a particular post, as an exercise. (URL) a post that flogs. There is nothing in that post (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		Re: I resign from the LPRV committee
(...) Different than an online community, I'm sure you would agree, but clearly a source of a lot of useful insight, thanks for sharing it. (...) And elsewhere, that's been my management experience (in real life) as well. (snipped the rest, all (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		Re: LUGNET members association
(...) Why not? It was my point, that without someone saying "We've listened, we've considered it carefully, we worked our process and we worked our review process, and we don't at this time see a need to change this particular reviewing action, and (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		Re: Badgering emails
(...) That's a good question. Should the admin team consider Kevin's multiple attacks on Lenny and myself to be "personal attacks" as well? Or does the higher standard principle apply here, that we have to endure everything on and off line? I (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		Re: One comment
(...) What we consider profane differs, I guess. But it's not that big a deal. I just wanted to make sure that no one could say you posted a link to something objectionable without warning about it, that's all. (recall that you asked about that very (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		(canceled)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

		Re: One comment
(...) Go ahead, please do post the whole thing. I have the same log you do, so if you edited it, it would be pretty obvious there was a discrepancy, wouldn't it? Also please remember that you would need to warn that it may contain material that some (...) (19 years ago, 23-Apr-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)

pieniazek
(score: 0.352)

More: Next Page >>