Results 681 – 700 of about 16000.
|
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.
|
|
| |
|  
pieniazek
(score: 0.353)
|
|
 | | Re: LSynth and string
|
| (...) er... ya. Didn't they actually DO green string already or am I misremembering? (...) That's pathetic. (19 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.353)
|
|
| | Re: LSynth and string
|
| (...) Umm... you REALLY should use a better string element than mine! It is really not very accurate as it doesn't model the three strands at all. It was just a quick hack, and it has fixed colors, if LEGO ever do red or white string it won't work. (...) (19 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.353)
|
|
| | Re: Request to move .mecha
|
| (...) Some informal, unofficial feedback. The admins have bounced this around a bit. As we see it there are 3 main options: - leave mecha where it is, at build.mecha - move mecha to a new top level group, like .trains (your request explains that you (...) (19 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.353)
|
|
| | Re: Request to move .mecha
|
| (...) if I missed one. Going forward, it's not necessary to post cancel requests, you can mail them to any admin. It's not really WRONG to post the request, I suppose, but it's a bit cluttering. (19 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.353)
|
|
| | Re: LPRV?
|
| (...) The V in review. I didn't pick it! Matt did I think because he set up the list (1) I would have went with LPPRC (Lugnet Policy & Procedure Review Committee) Too late now though! 1 - you do-s the work you get-s to picks the acronymie-s (19 years ago, 26-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.353)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.353)
|
|
| | Re: Posting Policy Changes
|
| (...) What address did you mail? We have been having technical problems with some addresses. if it was actually feedback (at) ... then ya, that may not go anywhere other than the owner. Per this page (URL) it's not really the right place for (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.353)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.353)
|
|
| | Re: Curatorship of lugnet.trains
|
| (...) Tim David has very kindly agreed to assist with this, please show him every courtesy as he gets his feet wet. I'm sure he'd appreciate content suggestions mailed to him, you can find his address at the bottom of the sidebar (where he added (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.353)
|
|
| | Re: LEGO Star Wars demo game available for download
|
| (...) I TOLD Nik he should have gotten a PS2 instead of a GameCube but he was all like, "I want to play Mario and SMB, not GTA"... Since he paid for it I couldn't argue but now he gets to regret his decision (he's already been moaning about it!) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.starwars)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.353)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.353)
|
|
| | Re: LUGNET members association
|
| (...) I'm happy to report that you should be back on the committee as soon as the email is reconfigured (from the LTT perspective). (which should be about 2 min after Matt reads his mail) I didn't even think to ask the rest of the LPRV how they felt (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.353)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.353)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.353)
|
|
| | Re: Posting Policy Changes
|
| (...) We've had a lot of trouble with spoofed IDs, and also with emails that were not possible to spam decode, or not possible for LUGNET itself to parse properly, which is not really related to whether someone has made a donation or not. Todd took (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.353)
|
|
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.353)
|
|
| | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) Yes, honestly, I am. Not for me but for the other admins too. As I said, we had some situations in the past where emails (from other admins, NOT from me) went blocked or went lost and we, the admins, had no idea it happened. I agree that short (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.353)
|
|
| | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) I'm talking about the general case. We've had several situations in the recent past when mail from admins was not received (and no bounce was returned) which led to difficulty, warnings not received, timeouts not properly started because they (...) (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.353)
|
|
| | Re: Badgering emails
|
| (...) Not really, no. I agree that's the desired end state but that's not what the server does now, is it? I'm asking about what should be done NOW. (19 years ago, 25-Apr-05, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
pieniazek
(score: 0.353)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
