Results 5721 5740 of about 16000.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.244) |
|
| | Re: Suggestion Box
|
| (...) Great idea!! Thanks!! (and I see Cary C. already posted some great ones) Would you like to see older, as yet unimplemented, suggestions reposted here to keep them in one place (in toto, or perhaps as links?) or would you prefer they be not (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.244) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.244) |
|
| | Re: Going once, going twice, sold!
|
| (...) With the hope of more to come. :-) (...) I can do without the interest introduced by Galidor, but I digress. (...) Not sure I agree. The parts will be freely available since once the numbered edition is done (and it seems to be done now), (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.244) |
|
| | Re: Going once, going twice, sold!
|
| (...) I think the display base is glued up to avoid any need for instructions. That's what Jake's note that you're quoting says, anyway. (the note speaks of it being glued in two sections for ease of shipping, presumably one section is the vertical (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.244) |
|
| | Re: April 1st
|
| (...) The best LEGO(r) April Fools joke this year, in my not so humble opinion, was not here on LUGNET(tm) but rather was the "winning" ISCC entry, which was set up by René himself and which must have taken months to pull off. I suspect Ben's hand (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.244) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.244) |
|
| | Re: UCS Yoda Missing Parts?
|
| (...) No way. I would say probably well over 1/2 of the different set types I have bought from the 2000 and 2001 lines have went straight into the parts bins. (if you count NUMERICALLY, it's far higher... after all there is no need to put every (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.general)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.244) |
|
| | Re: GPF on manual zoom in MLCad 2.11
|
| (...) I read through the back issues of this group before posting and got the impression that the crash being fixed was a different one than one related to zoom. (and I have to admit, I chuckle at the term... after all, what crash is "solicited" ?? (...) (23 years ago, 3-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.244) |
|
| | Re: 1st ISCC - The Final
|
| In lugnet.build.contests, Holger Matthes writes: <snip> René gets the prize for the longest time setup on an April Fool's prank, eh? That entry of "his" has been stewing for at least 4 months. I admit, I was one of the people that voted on it (I (...) (23 years ago, 2-Apr-02, to lugnet.build.contests)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.244) |
|
| | Re: UCS Yoda Missing Parts?
|
| (...) There are several occurences of the same part twice (for example, one of several): 2 3622 Tan Brick 1 x 3 46 3622 Tan Brick 1 x 3 Thanks! (23 years ago, 2-Apr-02, to lugnet.general)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.244) |
|
| | GPF on manual zoom in MLCad 2.11
|
| I have a fairly complex model as an MPD I am working on with lots of submodels, and when I have it set to "draw to current part", I am experiencing GPFs (or mysterious terminations) of MLCad 2.11 when I use manual zoom. I will be zooming in or out, (...) (23 years ago, 2-Apr-02, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.244) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.244) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.244) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.244) |
|
| | Re: town contest - voting thoughts
|
| (...) I have to agree, this was really tough... I had originally voted for 3 of what I felt were the most amazing models but I went back and looked and realised I had picked the biggest, too, so went and reviewed. But all 3 of my votes still went (...) (23 years ago, 1-Apr-02, to lugnet.build.contests)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.244) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.244) |
|
| | Re: New Parts
|
| (...) Glue?? Ewwww.... (...) Not that there's anything WRONG with that! I THOUGHT I saw milling machine marks. :-) John, you should have posted something about some obscure set you found with these nifty new parts in them (after brassoing the marks (...) (23 years ago, 1-Apr-02, to lugnet.technic)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.243) |
|
| | Re: New Parts
|
| (...) Actually not a bad idea! The (misnamed in my view) light grey "technic 1 1/2 pin" *almost* fills the bill, it almost fits inside a brick bottom, except for it's shoulder But plate thickness is fine. That's what THEY did in theirs. (...) Size? (...) (23 years ago, 1-Apr-02, to lugnet.technic)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.243) |
|
| | Re: timeout errors at bricklink
|
| (...) Exactly where you get these seems to fluctuate. Sometimes you can get into stores to browse, but can't place an order. Sometimes you can get into the discussion group to read, but can't post. And sometimes (like right now, for me anyway) you (...) (23 years ago, 1-Apr-02, to lugnet.market.brickshops)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.243) | More: Next Page >>
|