|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.248) |
|
| | Re: pictures at tracker
|
| (...) Yep, that's the right place to focus. I think Rosco may be right too, subpart images are not as useful. Does that cut the volume down at all usefully, though? (22 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.cad)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.248) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.248) |
|
| | Re: pictures at tracker
|
| (...) Now that is a way cool offer! Awesome! (...) Me too. I don't USE make every day but I know it's one of the niftiest things there is in the computer world. Make can make *anything*. Well, just about: $ make love make: do not know how to make (...) (22 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.cad)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.248) |
|
| | Re: pictures at tracker
|
| (...) Yes. Even if you had to go back and forth one part at a time, it would be better than having to download the DAT file each time. I hear you about not downloading 500 images but there is a lot to be said for Peeron and the contemplative power (...) (22 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.cad)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.248) |
|
| | Re: pictures at tracker
|
| (...) Well, not sure. Bear with. Remember that make doesn't actually make things. Or find things. It just uses other programs to make them or find them based on production rules. In this case it's actually LDGlite that needs to find the correct (...) (22 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.cad)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.248) |
|
| | Re: pictures at tracker
|
| (...) Hey... this is starting to sound like build/make dependency analysis. Any chance of getting good old "make" itself to do the work of figuring out what needs to be regenned when a file is uploaded? The dependency calculation seems (...) (22 years ago, 16-May-02, to lugnet.cad)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.248) |
|
| | Re: pictures at tracker
|
| (...) Um I think I hit send too fast because I *was* talking about the list page... the detail page probably should just always show the image but on the list page, let the user toggle. Right now the list page is one big list though, which is very (...) (22 years ago, 15-May-02, to lugnet.cad)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.248) |
|
| | Re: pictures at tracker
|
| (...) I think this is a great idea. How well does it work for primitives and subfiles, though? If this could be done it would really increase ease of use of the tracker. Rather than putting it on the detail page though, I would suggest the Peeron (...) (22 years ago, 15-May-02, to lugnet.cad)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.248) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.248) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.248) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.248) |
|
| | Re: Dave's Anti-American Rant
|
| (...) I don't see being "anti-corporation" and "anti-capitalism" as at all the same thing, BTW. If the corporations we are talking about are the sort of crony driven parasitic influence purchasers as ADM, (or US Steel) for example, I am about as (...) (22 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.248) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.248) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.248) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.248) |
|
| | Re: Bricklink down?
|
| (...) Forgot to update (and Eric may have been swamped so didn't get a chance to) but it seems to have returned to service mid evening on 13 May... (22 years ago, 14-May-02, to lugnet.market.brickshops)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.248) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.248) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.248) |
|
| | Re: Part Id Request
|
| (...) triple) possibly teamed with a 3043 "Slope brick 45 2 x 2 double" to give the longer stones. That's the most I've ever seen of those parts in white! (because I can't remember seeing either of them in white before at all) (22 years ago, 13-May-02, to lugnet.general)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.248) |