To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: pieniazek
 Results 3501 – 3520 of about 16000.
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: PNLTC Contact...
 
(...) Hey Will, thanks for being helpful! Prolly best not to post emails in cleartext any more as it defeats the code that Todd put in to hide them, though. See you in Seattle in 2004??? (21 years ago, 6-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains.org)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.285)

  Re: $7000+ PayPal Warning
 
(...) I believe, but am not sure, that Paypal is more like a processor than a merchant. Or if not, they are somehow closely connected to a processor or bank. I carry a Paypal branded MasterCard debit card. Paypal rebates 1.5 % of all spending (when (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jun-03, to lugnet.market.services, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.285)

  Re: MOC Streamliner Observation Car
 
(...) I heard it was due to cheap electricity in the NW part of the US. Bauxite smelting can make good use of cheap electricity. (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.285)

  Re: LEGO® Company Asks: What Will You Make?
 
(...) Whoa! Cool! Go HoMa! Go Sean! Spotlighted. (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.mediawatch)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.285)

  Re: ISCC II winners
 
(...) There's one special prize (and a few regular prizes) from MTW. If you won a regular prize, nag me about it... it's on my list to contact you and work out arrangements but feel free to nag away. On the special prize I have been very very bad. (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.build.contests)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.285)

  Re: Even more Wow!! for your buck!!! was Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
 
(...) The latter I think... by having a truck long gap, the motor coasts across the gap but never shorts out from one wheel set to the other, once it hits the powered side again (even though the polarity is reversed) it just continues on. This is (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jun-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.285)

  Re: posting oddities (was: <dcx is cool!>
 
(...) How does it work now? Based on what the previous post was set to? That usually makes sense I guess, I just got bit by it. (...) in 7487... ((URL) the new content there is "in the below example..." so it belongs on top. That's where I put it. (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.285)

  Re: Even more Wow!! for your buck!!! was Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
 
(...) That diagram is divided into two blocks. One for the approaches, and one for the reverse loop itself. That's standard wiring, been done that way since I was a wee lad, there's no need to divide the reverse loop itself into two blocks. With (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.285)

  posting oddities (was: <dcx is cool!>
 
(...) Gotta remember to check the format box every time, I guess, I didn't want FTX for that post. While I have your ear, what's up with putting my text at the bottom? I know Steve B asked about it, but you can see that in this case, I clearly (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.285)

  Re: Segregation is finally abandoned on the Burlington Northern
 
(...) I'll bite... tell us more about the scenery that's used for the setting. Maybe I haven't been paying attention but this is the first time I can recall someone using conventional MR scenery for a LEGO backdrop. Is that scenery from an existing (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.trains)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.285)

  Re: Even more Wow!! for your buck!!! was Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
 
(...) Urp, in the below, when i posted it before, none of the urls are clickable! Sorry about that. And "snip" inside angle brackets IS clickable.... I'm confused. XFUT admin.nntp... (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains, lugnet.admin.nntp)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.285)

  Re: Even more Wow!! for your buck!!! was Re: Woo Hoo!!!!! (part deux...)
 
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, David Koudys wrote: <snip> Regarding reverse loops and DCC I seem to recall that it's possible to automate them so you don't have to cut gaps that the motor has to coast across See this track diagram (URL) consider what (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jun-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.trains, FTX)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.285)

  Re: Avatars?
 
(...) no, I think that's what I was referring to. I could do a screenshot to confirm we're talking about the same thing but ya I think you got it. (21 years ago, 1-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.285)

  Re: Avatars?
 
(...) Neat idea. not sure how well it would work for me though, AT&T (er, that is Comcast) doesn't assign fixed IP addresses. and I am on so many different connections in the course of the month (sometimes dozens, seriously) that it would be an (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.285)

  Re: Avatars?
 
(...) The mess referred to is at posting composition time. the posting box may need to be changed to more closely wrap the line wrap??? (21 years ago, 1-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.285)

  Re: Avatars?
 
(...) depends on the ease of turn-off-able-ness One click or less, retained from session to session across whatever machine I am logged in on, and maybe. (line wrapping messes left unrepaired, you may want to look into more work (I know you have (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.285)

  Re: US finds evidence of WMD at last !
 
(...) Sort of. I said it was my fear, and a likely outcome, but not a certainty. At least that's the way I *prefer* to remember it. Peace-loss probability is increasing, in my view, that's for sure. Plus I can't take credit for coining the phrase by (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.285)

  Re: Avatars?
 
(...) Please, no. (21 years ago, 1-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.285)

  Re: Signature Image Abuse
 
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Todd Lehman wrote: <snip> (...) It's not just a matter of lines, it's a matter of bandwidth consumed. Consider this post: (URL) current "signature" is only 2 or so lines long (depending on how you count) but has a 30K (...) (21 years ago, 1-Jun-03, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.285)

  (canceled)
 
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.285)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR