Results 1481 1500 of about 16000.
|
Search took 0.00 CPU seconds.
|
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.332) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.332) |
|
| | Internment (was Re: Lavender Brick Society
|
| (...) US citizens of Japanese descent were classified as POWs? I did not know that. It's scary if true. It also gives ammo to the Bushies and their Enemy Combatant thingie. I hope you're wrong... I'm scared you're right. Also I thought the Geneva (...) (20 years ago, 21-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.332) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.332) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.332) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.332) |
|
| | Re: human sexuality
|
| (I'm at a client, so it's a hassle to switch identities, but I'm wearing my Admin hat in this post) This post is not just directed at Chris. (...) To clarify. we did not censor anyone, nor did we wish to. LUGNET does not practice censorship. I (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.332) |
|
| | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
| (...) Google for "Metrosexual". Not "swishy", but perhaps hitting some of the stereotypes (well groomed, fit and trim, with it trendwise, fashionably dressed, etc...) that people have (c.f. _Queer Eye for the Straight Guy_ which clearly (seems to, (...) (20 years ago, 20-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.332) |
|
| | Re: Fed UP!!!!!!!!
|
| In lugnet.general, Josh Wedin wrote: (snip) .general is not an appropriate place for this discussion. Josh please see: (URL) (among others) and please respect the FUT. If you have issues with why .general is not a good place, let's talk about them (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jul-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.color)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.332) |
|
| | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
| (...) See the charters of the newly created groups. Or review the discussion that has went on here. Or in particular, review Todd's posts, the same ones you commended me to take a look at. I'm not sure it's productive to produce a summary purely for (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.332) |
|
| | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
| (...) Um, I was part of the decision making process, Terry, so telling me to check with Todd is perhaps a symptom that you haven't been paying close attention to the discussion on this topic or others relating to LUGNET operations. My comments are (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.332) |
|
| | Re: New poll: sexuality and Lugnet
|
| (...) You left out several responses... The usual one that every poll should have... - This poll is flawed in some way and therefore the answers should not be taken as guidance plus two more... - This poll is inappropriate and likely to be divisive (...) (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.332) |
|
| | Re: Serious group requests
|
| (...) Good suggestion. I think the group would also be useful for AFOLs to share advice on how to deal with issues and concerns of their NLSOs... (20 years ago, 19-Sep-04, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.331) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.331) |
|
| | What's on second? (was Re: Who's on first?
|
| (...) I'm here. My expectation (based on the people I know on LUGNET and how they generally welcome people, which is really cool) is that I'll be welcome to observe (and even contribute, when appropriate) here even if LGBT is not my personal (...) (20 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.331) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.331) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.331) |
|
| | Re: Information on Set 4886
|
| (...) I'm having a hard time getting excited about this set given its apparent price point. I do appreciate the additional info though! (20 years ago, 18-Sep-04, to lugnet.town, FTX)
| |
| pieniazek (score: 0.331) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.331) |
|
|
| pieniazek (score: 0.331) | More: Next Page >>
|