To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 25982
25981  |  25983
Subject: 
Re: False premise in this message needs to be identified as what it is
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 21 Sep 2004 14:01:28 GMT
Viewed: 
1607 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:

   Do you agree?

Well, sure.

I think that compared to at least some of the implications of “life affirming,” I this that satisfaction of preference is a better metric of morality. What generates more satisfaction/happiness, rather than what generates more life.

I guess it depends on the definition of “life affirming”, as I don’t see more life as necessarily better life. Being happy is very life affirming.

But ya.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: False premise in this message needs to be identified as what it is
 
(...) Well, sure. I think that compared to at least some of the implications of "life affirming," I this that satisfaction of preference is a better metric of morality. What generates more satisfaction/happiness, rather than what generates more (...) (20 years ago, 21-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

151 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR