Debate : 25980


Off-Topic / Debate / 25980	25979 \| 25981

Subject:	Re: False premise in this message needs to be identified as what it is
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:48:07 GMT
Viewed:	1529 times

In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:

Do you agree?

Well, sure.

I think that compared to at least some of the implications of “life affirming,” I this that satisfaction of preference is a better metric of morality. What generates more satisfaction/happiness, rather than what generates more life.

Chris

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: False premise in this message needs to be identified as what it is
(...) I guess it depends on the definition of "life affirming", as I don't see more life as necessarily better life. Being happy is very life affirming. But ya. (20 years ago, 21-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: False premise in this message needs to be identified as what it is
(...) Under your morality, perhaps. I recognise that different people hold different moralities, and under other moral systems, there may well be moral implications here. However I also hold the (somewhat unpopular and somewhat hard to prove (...) (20 years ago, 21-Sep-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

151 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search