|
 | | Followup to Proposal of building theme "sequels"
|
| Hey all, Just wanted to say that I wasn't suggesting this idea as a contest. I envisioned it as more of a Moonbase Module kind of thing. We set a few guidelines and let the builder's imagination do the rest. I cetainly wouldn't want to place a time (...) (21 years ago, 29-Apr-03, to lugnet.space)
| |
|  
set, followup
(score: 3.315)
|
|
| | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
| (...) Kelly set .terms on purpose, by the precedent that Suz set when she announced ((URL) the "New Policy on Bickering in LUGNET Newsgroups", not by mistake. I've reset the FUT there to keep things together (there is already another followup there) (...) (20 years ago, 28-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.terms)
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.315)
|
|
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.315)
|
|
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.315)
|
|
| | Re: Hello
|
| (...) Nope. That would be me. I got tired of waiting for Agent to check all of them everyday And the email is easy. Then I set up Outlook to peel away all the (VERY few, as it turns out. This rule was unnecessary) loc.* mail ===...=== My picture of (...) (26 years ago, 31-Dec-98, to lugnet.loc.us.wi.eau)
| |
|
outlook, set
(score: 3.315)
|
|
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.315)
|
|
| | Re: Something different
|
| "Paul Rutenberg" <Paul_germany@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:G28ABo.8FJ@lugnet.com... (...) Model Team newsgroup is here: (URL) followup to this message is set to lugnet.modelteam ... (...) throwing (...) these as (...) writing (...) click on (...) (24 years ago, 10-Oct-00, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.315)
|
|
| | Re: I'm not incuded in treads
|
| (...) If they are using Outlook, then each individual who will need their own "cookie set" will need a separate windows login. A profile alone is not sufficient. Windows messaging wants to save this data with the user who was logged in, not just in (...) (26 years ago, 12-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
outlook, set
(score: 3.315)
|
|
| | Re: skirting port blocking?
|
| "Matthew Miller" <mattdm@mattdm.org> wrote in message news:slrnc3s027.249.....bu.edu... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) [ ... snipped ... ] This is exactly what I do at work to reply to my non-work e-mail. Anything I send from my Mindspring account at (...) (21 years ago, 26-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| |
|
outlook, set
(score: 3.314)
|
|
| | Re: member packets (continued)
|
| There is also still a large section about membership packets on that page under the "All Set?" header near the bottom. It really is sad that we have over 1000 members who are still waiting for these things. Bryan (22 years ago, 3-Feb-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
set, header
(score: 3.314)
|
|
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.314)
|
|
| | Re: Update on my Shell Station - etc. from Scott
|
| (...) The URL to it? I thought I made that change already (and it WAS only 2 pages, did it blossom when you got it?) The margins are set pretty wide. Or did you not get my latest set of changes (that is, did Outlook not send it AGAIN?) (...) ?? I (...) (23 years ago, 6-Jul-01, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
| |
|
outlook, set
(score: 3.314)
|
|
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.314)
|
|
| | Re: What TLG set "revolutionized" your building?
|
| (...) Yeah, way to go, Dave! That one was money in the bank. Now, if you'd be so kind as to explain it.... (...) ??? Does such a person exist? Has such an intellect ever existed??? <consults Magic 8 Ball> "Outlook not so good". Okay, yes, I know (...) (17 years ago, 30-May-07, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
| |
|
outlook, set
(score: 3.314)
|
|
| | Re: Pull down menus
|
| "Rick Kujawa" <spacerocks@iname.com> wrote in message news:FzCEw0.K70@lugnet.com... (...) posting (...) menus? I (...) IMHO I don't think a pulldown/selection field is a good option. There are too many newsgroups to make a selection box more (...) (24 years ago, 15-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.314)
|
|
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.314)
|
|
| | Re: New UK Bricklink store - NinjaBricks!
|
| (...) Well, only one of the 3 groups was out of place (lugnet.announce) - and, IMHO, it was only a questinable post to .announce, and not worthy of strong censure. (...) I think one announcement is acceptable, as long as followup is set to .publish (...) (22 years ago, 20-Feb-03, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.314)
|
|
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.314)
|
|
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.314)
|
|
| | Re: Followup: USA soccer team at the World Cup
|
| (...) I'm not sad because of the defeat, I'm upset because we played below our level AGAIN (that makes it the third time in the last 6 games, the worst of which was against Finland). It's really frustrating to know they could have done better, like (...) (22 years ago, 15-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
set, followup
(score: 3.314)
|
