Subject:
|
Re: Strategy/algorithm for Followup-To field in non-discussion groups
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 12 Oct 1998 20:15:45 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
MATTDM@MATTDM.stopspamORG
|
Viewed:
|
753 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> Yes, it's just a message to STDERR... The rejection messages for HTML
> postings versus (for example) binary postings are currently different.
Cool. That's the way it should be.
[snip]
> I wonder if that also has the side-effect of making it too easy to post to
> the announce group. :)
:) Well, posters would still have to set a follow-up line.
> I don't think anyone believes that moderating the announce group would be a
> bad idea...just...still...a tiny bit hesitant...
I'm generally opposed to making things moderated, partly because it can
generate a lot of work, and partly because I don't like the delay associated
with the message having to be checked by a human, and partly because I just
in principle like everything to work automagically.
> I need to read up on moderated groups a bit more. I think it's already set
> up so that moderated messages get mailed out fine. I'm unsure about how
> they finally get injected -- how they get back to the newsserver from the
> mailer.
Yeah I'm a bit unclear on that too. Sorry. :)
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
9 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
