To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.admin.generalOpen lugnet.admin.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Administrative / General / 332
331  |  333
Subject: 
Re: Strategy/algorithm for Followup-To field in non-discussion groups
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general
Date: 
Mon, 12 Oct 1998 19:47:59 GMT
Reply-To: 
mattdm@mattdm.SPAMCAKEorg
Viewed: 
594 times
  
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
Q: should messages be required to be crossposted to the group to which
Followup-To is set? That way, people who don't subscribe to the announce
group but do subscribe to the relevant discussion area will see the original
message.
Aha, good, yes, probably, hmm...

Of course, this isn't a good idea for something like the .dat group being
discussed for the cad folks.

I haven't looked into this, but can you customize the error message returned
when a posting fails? That seems important if non-standard behavior like
this is implemented.

An alternative to rejecting posts which don't have the Followup-To group in
the Newsgroups line is to add it automatically. This is more transparent,
which is generally good, but has the side-effect of putting posts somewhere
other than what the author specified, which could be confusing. (Although,
since they did choose the followup group, that might not be much of a
problem .)

--
Matthew Miller                      --->                  mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us                       --->             http://quotes-r-us.org/



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Strategy/algorithm for Followup-To field in non-discussion groups
 
(...) LOL -- I was just popping back into this group having just realized the same...sure would suck if all the .DAT files were crossposted! :) (...) Yes, it's just a message to STDERR... The rejection messages for HTML postings versus (for example) (...) (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Strategy/algorithm for Followup-To field in non-discussion groups
 
(...) Aha, good, yes, probably, hmm... --Todd (26 years ago, 12-Oct-98, to lugnet.admin.general)

9 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR