|
 | | Re: GMLTC
|
| Yes, our rule has always been no minors. We drink a beer with dinner now and again, we talk about mature subjects... all in the context of... I don't ever want to face the day where I stand accused by a minor for anything and I mean this in the (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
| |
|  
gmltc
(score: 0.271)
|
|
| | GMLTC
|
| A year ago I asked the Greater Midwest Lego Train Club if I could become a member. Their response was "We are a highly localized group in The Twin Cities/Minnesota area." I dont know if that was the response any other of you guys, but I live in (...) (24 years ago, 24-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 0.271)
|
|
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 0.271)
|
|
| | Re: GMLTC Site
|
| (...) I understand. We are all on a budget. I wrote a Drag and Drop capable AppleScript that uses GraphicConverter (more sharware) to scale pictures. You could use it to create thumbnails. Have a Mac user use AppleShare via TCP/IP and connect to my (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 0.271)
|
|
| | Re: LTC Links Page
|
| I'm thinking that you're not reading your emails or the posts to trains.org ((URL) john... <grin> Can you change the gmltc to gmltc.homeip.net? Thanks -john (...) (24 years ago, 21-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 0.271)
|
|
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 0.271)
|
|
| | Re: the first few pictures of the new GMLTC layout
|
| (...) We have a minifig in a white tuxedo shout out, "De Rail, De Rail!!" ;-) Actually, the red window panels in front are removable, and the track runs exposed on the back side. In the corners might get interesting, though... -John (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 0.271)
|
|
| | Re: the first few pictures of the new GMLTC layout
|
| (...) As J-2 said, the windows in front lift up, and we also build in 'access panels' at key spots around the layout. We're planning on running the subway trains using RCX power, at a very low power level - so we don't think there will be any (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 0.271)
|
|
| | Re: the first few pictures of the new GMLTC layout
|
| (...) Actually, it looks brighter in person. The camera's exposure meter was fooled by the bright light coming down the stairway. (The stairs will open up inside the train station on the surface.) We've debated the subway lighting. We decided we (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 0.271)
|
|
| | Re: the first few pictures of the new GMLTC layout
|
| (...) Wow, those are big trees. They rock. Subway: Nice start but... needs more people! (wait, that's J1's line) That guy in the green wizard hat, that's Dan Jezek counting his money after selling you a few key bricks, right? :-) (on the Hawaiian (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 0.271)
|
|
| | Re: GMLTC Site
|
| (...) Blame that on 'el cheapo' shareware software that we used to create the thumbnails. We want to completely rewrite the website - just because I've owned the domain name for 2+ years doesn't mean we work on it very often! <grin> We'll probably (...) (24 years ago, 25-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 0.271)
|
|
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 0.271)
|
|
| | Re: User Groups
|
| (...) The only regularly active group I'm aware of here is the GMLTC, which meets once a week. Unfortunately, as posted recently in .trains, we're starting to have problems stuffing the number of people showing up into the available space. We did (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.loc.us.mn.msp)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 0.271)
|
|
| | Re: 'Dog Bone'
|
| (...) I'm working on that very thing for the new GMLTC layout. I've got it pieced together (no pun intended!) in my head, it's just a matter of programming the RCX and give it a whirl. If I'm thinking of everything correctly, it's a simpler solution (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 0.271)
|
|
| | Re: TeenLTC?
|
| (...) OK I am confused... I thought that Kai was posting because he thought that GMLTC was inappropriate because it only covered Minnesotta not the Midwest. I didn't think the argument was about age restrictions at all. Isn't Kai a member of MILTC? (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 0.271)
|
|
| | Re: I<whatever>LTC summary
|
| (...) Larry, Thanks for the summary this is basically just as I see it at the moment. <snip summary> (...) Yes. (...) Good point. Trains are definitly the most likely thing to be displayed at the moment so it is probably not going to be a common (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 0.271)
|
|
| | Re: IBLTC
|
| (...) Yeah, I agree with Todd here. The word "brotherhood" is a little too exclusive (We actually have female members in the GMLTC). I realize it would be cool to follow along in the same vein as train unions, but I would suggest something like (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 0.271)
|
|
| | Re: IBLTC
|
| (...) Hmm. Well, as a fellow NELUG member, I have to admit that I am rather counter to the idea of a "meta-group" representing NELUG when facing any other organisation, espeically TLC. I am certainly not opposed to seeing some kind of forum where (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 0.271)
|
|
| | Re: I<whatever>LTC summary
|
| (...) That was one of the topics we talked and dreamed about at the 'summit' in New York - how "awesome" it would be to have a show where two or three (or more!) different LTCs could display. (Either separately or as one huge combined layout.) Can (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 0.271)
|
|
| | Re: What's in a name? (I*LTC)
|
| (...) I don't have any objections, but since I just heard about this in the past few days, it seems rather quick to pick a name within just a few days, especially if it ends up getting written in stone before everyone has had a chance to narrow (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 0.271)
|
