To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trains.orgOpen lugnet.trains.org in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / Train Organizations / 1202
1201  |  1203
Subject: 
Re: I<whatever>LTC summary
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains.org
Date: 
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 22:07:57 GMT
Viewed: 
546 times
  
In lugnet.trains.org, Eric Kingsley writes:
In lugnet.trains.org, Larry Pieniazek writes:

(I'd like to see module standards thrashed out again, there has been some
deviation from the last time which is fine, the situation changed)

Module standards are a good thing (ala NTrack) but I think it will take a lot
of work.  I doubt many, if any groups can afford to do GMLTC modules so that
is tough but maybe we could design some sort of "transition" module to go
between a GMLTC module and say a PNLTC module.  I think the NELUG tables and
the WAMALTC tables have the same surface dimensions but I think our leg length
might be different.

Of course this only matters when we have 2 or more groups displaying together
but it would be nice to know if 2 groups modules would work together.

Eric Kingsley
That was one of the topics we talked and dreamed about at the 'summit' in
New York - how "awesome" it would be to have a show where two or three (or
more!) different LTCs could display.  (Either separately or as one huge
combined layout.)  Can you imagine the response from the 'traditional' model
railroaders?  <grin>

JohnG, GMLTC



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: I<whatever>LTC summary
 
(...) Right. And to make it work, it's not required that every group conform to some rigid standard (ala N-trak), although that gives you the most flexibility. *all* that is required is that a few modules from each layout can somehow interface, not (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: I<whatever>LTC summary
 
(...) Larry, Thanks for the summary this is basically just as I see it at the moment. <snip summary> (...) Yes. (...) Good point. Trains are definitly the most likely thing to be displayed at the moment so it is probably not going to be a common (...) (24 years ago, 27-Feb-01, to lugnet.trains.org)

12 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR