|
 | | Re: Help John find his mojo-logo
|
| (...) I've used that on and off for some time now. I guess I've been more religious in using it of late. Actually, I'd like the Dave! better if it could be italicized - a Tolkienian word of power! Githoniel A Elbereth! JOHN. Hmmm (walking about it (...) (22 years ago, 12-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
|  
dead
(score: 1.050)
|
|
| | Re: The Brick Testament parts the Red Sea
|
| (...) These points aren't entirely correct and without going into a full bible study I will write what I have found to be true The points 1-3. God is not like unto a plant, you ought to look at Him more like this- God the invisible spirit who is the (...) (22 years ago, 11-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.050)
|
|
| | Re: Starscream, Prime and Megatron Preview
|
| *the sound of a dull thud echoes around the halls as my Jaw hits the floor* NIIIICE :D absolutely superb work here, dead on likeness on each, I'm so very impressed - but they don't transform :( my optimus may not look as impressive, but he does (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.050)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.050)
|
|
| | 9v, 18v 36v oh my!
|
| Inspired by all the cool things last night, AND reviewing Dave's info on 18V dc from 2 lego battery box's, THEN seeing Jeff E's post on using 2 smaller 9v battery box's directly; here is what I've learned: 1. I need a better way to take digital (...) (22 years ago, 14-Dec-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.050)
|
|
| | Re: Two Towers (was Re: Fellowship)
|
| (...) Ou-uch! I was watching Nemesis Saturday, there were two people sitting right next to me discussing Star Trek, and they were wondering if James Doohan was dead. Somehow they asked me... and then we had a great discussion about Star Trek. They (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.050)
|
|
| | Re: 8480 Space Shuttle Optic Fiber module
|
| In lugnet.technic, Stéphane Simard writes: <<snip>> (...) It's pretty fast actually and as luck would have it I have the set assembled at home, though I'm currently at work (shhh don't tell I'm Lugneting :-) ) I can't tell how fast. At first I had (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.technic)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.049)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.049)
|
|
| | Re: Starscream, Prime and Megatron Preview
|
| (...) Absolutely amazing work. Inspirational. I was lucky enough to see the original series air in chronological order starting back in back in '84(?). I might be dating myself here, but we're talking Lego & TF's! We would rush home straight from (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.049)
|
|
| | Re: Feedback thoughts?
|
| In lugnet.general, Timothy D. Freshly writes: <snip> (...) Tim, I think your entire post was great, and I agree with everything you said. I just wanted to comment on the time-lag issue. Sometimes I suffer this too. Even though I may have a little (...) (22 years ago, 18-Dec-02, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.049)
|
|
| | Re: Tech not dead
|
| (...) Wow! 9 cylinders, that's unprecedented, It's also the same number as on my AK912 crane. The thought of adding pnumatics to the shovel on the original JCB had crossed my mind before. Jonathan Wilson's right, the lack of beams is appalling. The (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.049)
|
|
| | Re: IGNORANT views fuel oppression?
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes: <snip> (...) Thanks for the clarification. I read your above comment as a different issue than the comment posted below-- (...) Your first comment--in a general sense, arguements have strengths and (...) (22 years ago, 18-Dec-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.049)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.049)
|
|
| | Creating the .space Crash Course
|
| I would like full community involvement for the next .space sidebar feature. I'd like to put together a section that will be helpful to .space newbies (and useful for old schoolers too). Paul Hartzog and I thought "The .space Crash Course" sounded (...) (22 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.space)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.049)
|
|
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
| (...) It looks a lot like an airport crash truck (a kind of fire truck) to me. Right down to the low slung body and fat all terrain wheels. The sickening lime green color is all the latest rage in crash truck colors, apparently.... (URL) that ugly (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.049)
|
|
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
| (...) I like the backhoe model as well, although I wonder if there are going to be any blue airtanks included... hopefully, since this looks like a large model using the 8466's large tires. It seems strange to me to have one technic set with 9 (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.049)
|
|
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
| Before reading any more of my reply, remember, I **agree** with you, I'm not very keen on the model either. Although... Nik likes it better than the backhoe. But then, he's 10. (...) How about this prototype? (URL) (from the site you referenced.... (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.049)
|
|
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
| (...) earlier this year and saw those actual trucks or ones very like them. It's sort of what you'd get if you mixed that reviled lime green LEGO color with the standard LEGO yellow we love so much, and then added a bit of white to lighten things (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.049)
|
|
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
| "Allan Bedford" <ExpertBuilder-DELET...otome.com> wrote in message news:H87rMF.3Ay@lugnet.com... (...) I totaly agree. I take 3 of that one, please! :) Can anyone see if there is a pnaumatic tank in there some place? I dont have one yet... (...) (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.049)
|
|
| | Re: TECHNIC IS NOT DEAD!!!
|
| Yeah!! :) I think, despite the odd looks of some of the models, the message is clear - Technic as a name may have fallen by the wayside, at least in TLC's plans, but the idea behind the parts is still alive and well - "build working models". That (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.technic)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.049)
|
