|
 | | Re: The Daily Rant
|
| (...) Her CD has some macromedia junk on it that really pushes to have you install AOL (yeah, right). But here are the website addresses: (URL) this one. Its OK. www.bmg-backstage.co.uk/natalie <-- this one is a dead link. Using: (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
|  
dead
(score: 1.218)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.217)
|
|
| | Re: WooHoo!!!
|
| (...) Which would explain why the Circuit City here is trying so hard to get rid of them. Pray, tell -- just why is DIVX dead? Actually, what exactly is DIVX? Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.217)
|
|
| | Win32 GUI woes
|
| Hey all, I'm wondering if anyone knows any cure for the following teeth-gnashing features that Win NT 4.0 has: 1 - You open a new window, launch an app, etc. and it takes up an ungodly amount of real estate on the screen. Like 80% of the pixels (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.217)
|
|
| | Re: CEO-Letter // The answer
|
| In lugnet.color, Gerhard R. Istok wrote: Snip (...) I agree and would love more of these windows. Unfortunately I have heard that this window mold can no longer be used. Would anyone from LEGO wish to comment on this? Widely used pieces such as this (...) (20 years ago, 9-Mar-05, to lugnet.color)
| |
|
legends
(score: 1.217)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.217)
|
|
| | Re: signals / legOS internals
|
| (...) Why signals?!? Unix-style asynchronous signals is the last feature I would ever want to implement or use. Brain-dead and very dangerous "feature". As you write; "The problem is that a signal can happen at any time". You shouldn't pass this (...) (25 years ago, 23-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.217)
|
|
| | Re: A lurkers opinion (formerly: Re: 2 Things...)
|
| (...) OK, check out the traffic page now. (URL) 4 messages is NEVER enough to catch up after a few hours of work. 20 is (...) The 4-message intro pages aren't really intended to be used as a newsreader. They're there as an invitation to see what a (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jun-99, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.216)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.216)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.216)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.216)
|
|
| | Re: What happened?
|
| (...) Dude, you need a sarcasm detector. Actually, since I don't see the people rising up against the government anytime soon, that argument is dead in the water.. Also, overthrowing the government by force is illegal anyway. You can always get guns (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.216)
|
|
| | Re: Question about 7101
|
| (...) Well done, Jeff. Definitely not lame. Is there any way you can beef it up? Or perhaps it would be best to not milk it to death. Let's not beat a dead horse... Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 28-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.pun)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.216)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.216)
|
|
| |
|
beneke
(score: 1.216)
|
|
| | Re: What happened?
|
| Ugh, I go on a 5 day vacation, and I get back to this! Oh well! :) (...) It doesn't matter if "that argument is dead in the water" (I don't think it is), the founding fathers put the second amendment in just in case the government gets out of (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.216)
|
|
| | Re: What happened?
|
| (...) Is that fortune or decision? (...) There are more than 50,000 IT jobs open right now, people could get skills and then get jobs that do provide those bennies. If people in your area started doing that, then either the tourism industry would (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jun-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.215)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.215)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.215)
|
|
| |
|
dead
(score: 1.215)
|
