To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: brad justus <10>10
 Results 3841 – 3860 of 3926.
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: Enough already
 
(...) A clearer distinction can be drawn by saying "you are acting like a such and such" as opposed to saying "you *are* a such and such." Similar to the difference between "you are lying" and "you are a liar." By criticizing someone's action or (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Enough already
 
(...) No skin off my nose - I know my IQ, and it's well over to the higher end of the scale (and I mean WELL over) ;-) (IQ != common sense, however) I stand by my "PROVE IT" comments. I wanted proof from TLC, and I got it, end of story - until we (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Enough already
 
(...) I'm probably in the minority here, but guess what? I don't care. I think what Kevin has done with Brickshelf.com is AWESOME. Utterly and completely AWESOME. I applaud his effort 100%. But you know what? For all the scans I've browsed through (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Enough already
 
(...) I know it was you, and I certainly didn't try to imply it was Todd saying that, although Todd said some thing that got me riled yesterday. And yes, there is _little_ distinction between calling someone a moron and saying they strike you as a (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Enough already
 
(...) Yah Rose! I'll add my support behind everything she said. Three cheers for Rose for the courage to write it! Kevin Loch has done wonders with his site, and his self-imposed restrictions make perfect sense to me. When I read Brad's note, I (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
On Sun, 19 Dec 1999, Jasper Janssen wrote: [RE: my hopeful dreamin' that LEGO will redesign their site for better usability and not for better security with obnoxious bells and whistles] (...) Well, to be honest, with the crew of designers they (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
(...) [mega-snip] And if material was once available (through normal (...) Hi Brad and welcome back. One major question: Your statement above: "material was once available (through normal navigational means), but no longer is, than it, too, is out (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Enough already
 
(...) No, not generous. Practical, yes for them. Nice for us.... Possibly? (...) Just need some clarification.... How do you mean that has TLG been disrespectful to us? By the lack of response to our requests? If this is what you mean, I don't see (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Enough already
 
(...) I certainly hope I'm not being included in this category. Your remarks in the quoted message deal mostly with scanned images, which was not my concern. I feel the issue of linking is an extremely serious one, and I would really resent being (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Enough already
 
(...) Hear, hear! IMHO, all of this backlash is ridiculous. The LEGO Company is being *extremely* generous in allowing scans of any their copyrighted materials up on websites *at all*[1]. Yet, all some people can do is complain that they aren't (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
(...) That's silly. Those two have absolutely nothing to do with each other. Brad even specifically mentioned something about "by accident or by intent". So you're telling me that if you accidentally mistype a character in a URL and end up seeing an (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
 
Hello, Brad. I am one of a LEGO enthusiusts in Japan. I have a strong request for you. Please open the door of the LEGO Direct to Japanese LEGO enthusiusts, preferably from the beginning. We have been barred even from the LEGO Worldshop. It is not (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
(...) Gee. That's rather a cop-out, isn't it? (...) Yes, it does. (...) This is not about courtesy. At all. This is about a claim Brad made that it was _legally_ so. I am not saying it isn't impolite (though I don't agree..), I am saying it isn't (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
(...) If you insist. But no amount of sniping is going to convince me that "webserver"=public. What about firewalls? They're on an unsecured webserver, too - does that make them "public?" (...) And I am saying I don't care about the legalities. I (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
 
First off, I would like to say thanks to Brad for recognizing the AFOLs, it has been a long time comming. Echoing what Wayne Hussey just said, I to have always longed to know some information on parts made past and present. I have always hoped that (...) (25 years ago, 16-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
 
Brad, THANK YOU (and the LEGO Group) for opening the door! I plan to be among those AFOLs you'll be doing business with in the near future. Some of the items I'd like to see among the offerings are retired pieces of great interest [to me - and (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  (canceled)
 
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
(...) Todd's not stupid, so while I think he may be more inclined to make LUGNET an extremely TLC-friendly place policy-wise, I seriously doubt he'd implement policies that basically go against the entire grain of the WWW. This one part of Lego's (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
(...) What about <www.LEGO.com/topsecret> which when I found it last year had pre- release pics of the original SW sets that were coming out. There was a refernce to this URL in a Mania Magazine (which published the URL) but there was no link to (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

  Re: Introducing LEGO Direct
 
Bill Katz <billk@wald.wald-kramer.com> wrote in message news:944898283.20338...mer.com... (...) Brad: Bricks, slopes, plates and tiles are the place to start with bulk ordering - all colors, all sizes (personal plea - gray 1x__). Next, I would (...) (25 years ago, 13-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
 

brad
(score: 0.181)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR