Subject:
|
Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Sat, 18 Dec 1999 00:09:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1296 times
|
| |
|
|
Larry Pieniazek <lar@voyager.net> wrote:
> I too don't want this relatively minor point to come between us at the start
> of what I see as a great relationship. But my sense is that Lugnet official
> policy will hew to LEGO official policy, even when it's wrong, which will
> cause enough acrimony here on LUGNET to spoil the ability to accomplish the
> important work we all want to embark upon with you.
Todd's not stupid, so while I think he may be more inclined to make
LUGNET an extremely TLC-friendly place policy-wise, I seriously
doubt he'd implement policies that basically go against the entire
grain of the WWW.
This one part of Lego's official response is silly, we all know it.
We can't expect Brad (or probably any high-level administrative
type) to get that right off the bat, but they have people working
for them who ought to.
'Course, they have people designing their websites to rule out large
numbers of viewers while doing boneheaded things like leaving
non-public images out in public view too. :/
--
The parts you want and nothing else?
http://jaba.dtrh.com/ - Just Another Brick Auction
Why pay eBay? Run your own LEGO auctions for free!
http://www.guarded-inn.com/bricks/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
| (...) <snip> Thanks for the clarification of policy. (...) I guess I'll join the chorus of voices asking that you reconsider this. It's not a legally defensible policy, and it's not a practically defensible policy, and further, it sends a bad (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
