To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.dear-legoOpen lugnet.dear-lego in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Dear LEGO / 883
882  |  884
Subject: 
Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.dear-lego
Date: 
Fri, 17 Dec 1999 23:32:56 GMT
Reply-To: 
MATTDM@MATTDM.ihatespamORG
Viewed: 
1613 times
  
Jasper Janssen <jasper@janssen.dynip.com> wrote:
(one could argue that the listing of the hyperlink to that material is
tantamount to publishing the material itself).
And so a rather uninformed US judge has recently ruled.

Not so -- there was no ruling, just a preliminary injunction. Furthermore,
they aren't accused of publishing the copyrighted information illicitly, but
of being engaged in "contributory copyright infringement". I'm not a lawyer,
so I can't define that precisely, but it's certainly something different.
(If the original documents hadn't been in violation, then there wouldn't
have been a problem.) Hopefully, sanity will prevail and the final judgement
in this case will go the other way.


Contrary to my earlier claim, I've actually found a case about linking which
was thrown out of court:

<URL:http://www.techweb.com/wire/story/TWB19980922S0008>

This case was obviously more ridiculous than what the Lego Company is
claiming, but it illustrates how absurd this could get.

--
Matthew Miller                      --->                  mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us                       --->             http://quotes-r-us.org/



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
(...) Ah. Okay, I should have paid more attention, I guess. The US judicial system is about as clear to me as #1200 SiO grit mud, though. (...) Indeed. (...) Jesus. The linked to the imdb, and another random page on imdb linked to a (c) photo? "No (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
 
(...) And so a rather uninformed US judge has recently ruled. I don't suppose anyone wants to relocate the lugnet server to anywhere else but Australia or Hongkong? I think it's a _very_ sad day to see Lego take this stance. To get my position clear (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR