LUGNET News : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 941 – 960 of about 136000.

Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: Bicentennial Man and Immortality (was Re: Who James Isn't (was:Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
(...) Ah.... bask (...) I relaised latyer that we were talking about Asimov's robot, which movie now apparently has made it into release. I wonder if it'll go staright-to-video here or not get here at all. (...) Well, I hadn't been reading the (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.537)

		Re: Itty-bitty LEGO set looker-upper
(...) IIRC, there are actually 2 layers of the always-on-top property for windows in Win32 -- one which is local to the application and one in which the application itself is entirely above other applications. (I think one of these is in the (...) (25 years ago, 13-Feb-00, to lugnet.admin.database)

all, property
(score: 2.537)

		Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
(...) Hmmmm. If that _is_ what he is saying, I would tend to agree. But I personally would tend to place strict libertarianism as quite close to anarchy on that scale (strict libertarianism, after all, is just anarchy with "something" (not the (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.537)

		Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
(...) Stuff and Nonsense to the both of you, lazy thinkers!... I have 3 points to make: 1. People aren't as lazy(1) as you think. Most people are industrious and hard working, even in this screwed up society of today. It's only in Legoland where the (...) (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.536)

		Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
(...) Many rights are things we as a society make up. (As opposed to being somehow natural or god-given.) That doesn't mean that they're not good ideas! Why isn't it good to say that all people deserve be taken care of when they're sick? (...) Oh (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.536)

		Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
(...) Yes, and I've seen other such texts. I certainly wouldn't want a one-world government like that, and that's not what I'm advocating at all! (...) Ok, now we're back to the rights discussion. I don't see how a corporation gets the right to do (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.536)

		Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
<386E8B8E.EF62ED6C@voyager.net> <FnorLK.8q2@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) By John's definition, the socialist/anarchist Utopian projects are in the same category as "libertopias". I (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.536)

		Re: Roboarm from Dave Baum's super book
I'm by no means a legal expert, and perhaps I'm being a bit paranoid, but I don't believe its quite that simple. First, I wouldn't trust anything I wrote to actually hold up in a court of law, so I'd need to hire an attorney to write it. One way (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)

all, rights
(score: 2.536)

		Re: Swearing?
(...) I'm not convinced that it's all that clear cut. I have observed age-peers of mine who are markedly less worldly and make stupid decisions about their lives. At what magic age is one fully capable of making decisions such that we can (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.535)

		Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
<3874CFB7.C78E8E40@voyager.net> <FnxHxs.MKz@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Perhaps a workable patent system could be constructed which would recognize parallel development. I don't even see (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.535)

		Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
Sorry, this got long, and you probably won't like it, but there is plenty to argue with. Richard Franks wrote in message ... (...) a (...) of? (...) lot (...) recieve? (...) tax (...) up (...) millions of (...) it (...) Very likely, depending on (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.534)

		Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
(...) Trot them out, then. Or far better, and far far far more relevant, answer the main point, that most (not all!!!) homeless Americans deserve it because of the choices they made. Unlike almost all homeless Ugandans or Tibetians or Kurds or (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.534)

		Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
Richard Franks wrote in message ... (...) has (...) Ooh, even before I got better, I would never have supported this... (...) otherwise (...) sponsered (...) any (...) I used to have this opinion. My feeling now is that anything worthwhile that the (...) (25 years ago, 7-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.534)

		Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
(...) I stepped back a bit, and I suspect that what is frustrating both of us, leading to perhaps less well reasoned posts than normal on one or both sides, is that we're trying to discuss several things at once. Perhaps we should pick one topic, (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.534)

		Re: No gimmicks, just some free background images
(...) I see your reasoning behind the example. I think that it was at least a tad out of line given the recent history of this discussion. I remind you, the tone of this discussion has caused at least one valued member of the community to leave [or (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-00, to lugnet.market.theory)

all, property
(score: 2.534)

		Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
(...) Yes, I posted some things in a sarcastic tone. That doesn't mean I wasn't serious. But the fact that you weren't amused underlines the point that we disagree at an extremely basic level. So discussing the question of rights makes a lot of (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.534)

		Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
Richard Franks wrote in message ... (...) It hasn't been proven, but hasn't seen its chance yet either. Larry made a very good point last night - Libertarianism is working, despite all the regulation in the world. It can/will work. (...) ideas (...) (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.533)

		Re: missing boba fett
(...) Yeah, it does. But that would be, in effect, stealing. Not just stealing from LEGO, but from the entire LEGO community, because, some day five years from now, someone may need a replacement Boba Fett with the sets long out of production, and (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.starwars)

all, rights
(score: 2.533)

		Re: True Right Wing Fascists
(...) Right. And some christians are nazi fascists. You don't like being lumped in with them - that's all I'm saying. It's important to recognize the shades of distinction and not address people as if they represented all that was wrong with a (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.533)

		Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
(...) IMO, shareholders and the purchacing power of a few knowledgable consumers isn't enough to control corperations. What are the evils that corperations could do, if they were allowed? * Education - biased or limited, creating clones to work in (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 2.533)

More: Next Page >>