To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: all rights are property rights
 Results 401 – 420 of about 136000.
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
 
(...) OK, go ahead and invent away. I don't invent for free. (...) So let me see here, what you're proposing is that I go out and invent something, someone else steals my idea, gets it to market first, and makes a pile from the users, and I don't (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 3.341)

  Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
 
(...) Yes, me too. My hunch is we'll get into this in the property-rights discussion -- but not for a while yet. (...) (For the record, it actually turned out to be a terrible disaster.) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 3.341)

  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
(...) Yes, how to construct a good society is an important issue. I think that the property rights discussion may eventually get there in a few months. *grin* You're welcome to join in or follow along. (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 3.340)

  Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
 
(...) So the american frontier is what you want to return to? I've got news for you: That also requires returning to the technological and productivity levels of then. The reason those two are so much higher now than they were then is (...) (25 years ago, 1-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 3.339)

  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
Matt, (...) Well, going on the UN, and other organizations, like EU, etc. I would hope the US never joins it. (...) This whole rights discussion is pretty funny, Matt. Let's see, if corporations have no rights, than we should not have rights, nor (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 3.338)

  Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
 
(...) OK, what's your proposal, then? If they're not property, what are they? and how do the people that come up with them get incented? I ain't gonna invent stuff for you for free, you know... and neither is anyone else. Those 20,000 failed light (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 3.338)

  Re: Libertarian theory and altruism
 
I agree, let's put a pin in it for now. Let's start a new thread for that one. Until Todd fixes cnews, if we post in the thread where you discussed my life affirming post and agreed that initiating force is unacceptable, but didn't see the link to (...) (25 years ago, 8-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 3.338)

  Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
 
(...) I think ideas are not identical to physical items, and therefore not identical to physical property. But it is very useful to extend our concepts for dealing with physical property to the realm of ideas. Tangent: this is something to be (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 3.338)

  Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
 
(...) Not to mention on shaky accuracy ground! The Constitution doesn't speak of either god or rights. And the first ten amendments don't attribute the rights they speak of to any specific external source. The Declaration of Independence mentions (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 3.338)

  Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
 
<387424BA.8AA8A11@voyager.net> <slrn8797ta.341.matt...ia.bu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) Well, this doesn't narrow it down a lot, because the entire thread is still 400+ posts, but if you (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 3.336)

  Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
 
<38741B0A.4F62FC4B@c...anweb.net> <slrn879752.341.matt...ia.bu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) Yes. Unless you're a big fan of "the ends justify the means". Good outcomes do not justify (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 3.336)

  RCX2 API Update
 
I made some mistakes in the first release, so here is a new version. I've also added counter support. <-Readme.txt-> RCX2 Header file for NQC2.1r2 - 27 April 2000 - James Pritchard rcx2api.nqh - NQC Header file that contains constant and macros for (...) (24 years ago, 29-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
 

all, rights
(score: 3.335)

  Re: Goodness of Man? (was: Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
 
<3874CFB7.C78E8E40@voyager.net> <slrn879jtn.95s.matt...ia.bu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) I'm not sure. I haven't carried out an exhaustive analysis of the rights involved. I would tend to (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 3.335)

  RCX2 API
 
I've put together a NQC API file that allows you to use some of the RCX2 features. I don't no whether anyone else has already done this but here is mine. This is unofficial so is unsupported. All question should go to the group, not Dave or myself. (...) (24 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
 

all, rights
(score: 3.335)

  RCX2 API
 
I've put together a NQC API file that allows you to use some of the RCX2 features. I don't no whether anyone else has already done this but here is mine. This is unofficial so is unsupported. All question should go to the group, not Dave or myself. (...) (24 years ago, 26-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)  
 

all, rights
(score: 3.335)

  Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
 
(...) Good. So do I. Fortunately, that wasn't what I said. What I said was that if you are not willing to suffer for your art, you are not a worthy ARTIST, not that your art isn't worthy. I would say that to be true for any endeavour. If you expect (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 3.335)

  Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
 
(...) that (...) Certainly true. But I guess I'm a little frustrated by the way .debate is lately. It seems to be a few libertarians trying to explain how to make the world a better place vs. several times as many people saying "what if this, what (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 3.333)

  LEGO vs. MegaBloks
 
From CBC Radio November 25, 2004 (URL) Megabloks For some, building walls is child's play. You may remember spending hours stacking Lego blocks or Megabloks to make your own perfect worlds--full of spaceships and castles. Lego doesn't make a (...) (20 years ago, 2-Mar-05, to lugnet.mediawatch)
 

all, rights, property
(score: 3.333)

  Re: IP (was: Re: Any suggestions on a homepage?)
 
(...) Yes. There is a difference between SEEING content, and thus learning from it (read about "prior art" in the context of patents if you're interested in learning further about this topic), and USING content. If I read a book, that book is (...) (25 years ago, 18-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 3.330)

  Re: Turkey Auctions....
 
Please take notice of this email which concern's an ebay auction which as the Lego Logo displayed This is from the Lego Site : (URL) trademarks, and logos, displayed on the Site, are trademarks of the LEGO Group. Nothing contained on the Site should (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jan-00, to lugnet.market.auction)
 

rights, property
(score: 3.329)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR