|
 | | Re: Selling MOC Instructions? Your Thoughts?
|
| Based on what is shown in the message Tim links to (below), it would seem that the unique instructions you might create with such programs are your property, in much the same way as a document written in MSWord is owned by the author, not the (...) (23 years ago, 18-Dec-01, to lugnet.general)
| |
|  
all, property
(score: 2.346)
|
|
| |
|
all, property
(score: 2.346)
|
|
| | Re: Medical Marijuana
|
| (...) Depends on the court we are talking about. The current court has done all kinds of crazy things with our rights. That the power of the single state is losing ground to the idea of a single nation in an era of "globalization" is hardly (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.346)
|
|
| |
|
all, property
(score: 2.345)
|
|
| | Re: Medical Marijuana
|
| But does your constitution not give you supreme court the right to do “all kinds of crazy things” with your rights? By the way, I was talking about this story: US outlaws 'medical' marijuana (URL) A (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.345)
|
|
| | Re: Transformers
|
| (...) What you saw was Transformers: Robots in Disguise, the current TF series from Hasbro. The show (and most of the toys) are based on what was released in Japan last year by Takara. (There it was called Transformers: Car Robots.) The reason for (...) (23 years ago, 16-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.345)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.344)
|
|
| | Re: Customs question...
|
| (...) Nope. It doesn't. At least, not in a legal sense Legally, you don't have a say. *Especially* if it's in another country :) Does it matter what you think in terms of how moral you are? Sure. How honest you are? Sure. (...) Ah-- debatably (...) (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.344)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.344)
|
|
| | Re: Lego patents
|
| (...) That can't be true. You are saying that you couldn't patent a machine because it's made from standard parts? People patent electronic devices made from off-the-shelf logic chips all the time. I don't see any legal reason why a Lego machine (...) (23 years ago, 27-Dec-01, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 2.344)
|
|
| | Re: Conspiracy theories
|
| (...) Very True. I do think it was dealt with in the most unfortunate means though (shot down)- of course i have no proof, but lack of evidence rarely stops the big media, so why should i worry? ;-P (...) Good point. I guess the conspiracy stuff can (...) (23 years ago, 21-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.344)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.343)
|
|
| | Re: Customs question...
|
| (...) I'm not sure. I guess my strongest notion about morality is that it's a bogus idea (like religion) designed to manipulate others into building a society that benefits certain people. (i.e. my sense of morality, had I one that I championed, (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.343)
|
|
| | Re: Conspiracy theories
|
| (...) Because I thought it was an interesting link and that it would spark some interesting discussion. And it was, and it did. You all know that I'm mostly in the "can't trust government" camp. And I have no doubt whatever that (to pick one facet) (...) (23 years ago, 22-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.343)
|
|
| | Re: Medical Marijuana
|
| (...) I'll buy that, at least about certain issues. It seems to me that some states would immediately erode civil rights if given the chance and not prevented by the Fed from doing so. Yes, we always have privacy and search-and-seizure issues (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.343)
|
|
| | Re: Medical Marijuana
|
| (...) No, it's too plausible not to be true. The government thinks heroin is some big bad thing (it is) that we need to be protected from because we're too stupid (we're not)... so we have wild gyrations in the street price as we either bribe the (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.343)
|
|
| | Re: Who has the biggest fleet?
|
| (...) I'm not sure this is a useful question... bigger is not necessarily better. It's what you *do* with the parts that counts. By rights I have a bigger fleet than everything so far posted combined because I've bought hundreds of siths (and lots (...) (23 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.342)
|
|
| | Re: My Entry -- Re: Project X and game play
|
| (...) DAVE, your robot is nice and compact!!!! I just had a quick look at your page, and I've impressed. this is going to be a GREAT game. BTW has anyone got ideas for our next game or are we going to do the usual and brainstorm @ mels? (...) For (...) (23 years ago, 8-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 2.342)
|
|
| | Re: Apology.
|
| (...) No. Remove "think". He SAID it. Either it is true, or he's a liar. (I am not going to argue epistemology with you on this) My mistake was twofold (1) First, forgetting that he's a consistent liar and thinking that I'd be doing him a service in (...) (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.342)
|
|
| | Calling for banishment?
|
| I'm stuck here, because I'm more honest than most. Were the shoe on the other foot, Scott would have no qualms about saying he'd never do it again, even if in his heart of hearts he knew he might. Yes I violated Scott's privacy a teeny teeny bit. I (...) (23 years ago, 24-Nov-01, to lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.342)
|
