LUGNET News : Search Results: all rights are property rights


Search Results: all rights are property rights

Results 1441 – 1460 of about 136000.

Search took 0.02 CPU seconds.

Messages: Full | Brief | Compact

Sort: Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

		Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
(...) Say again? How can one worship the absence of God? or higher power? Higher Power, God. Semantics here? What then? You did not answer (...) Well, I happen to believe that establishing a religion entails a little more than that, and I think that (...) (22 years ago, 29-Jun-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 3.015)

		Re: More from REASON - A Nation of Liars (was Re: Supreme Court Rules Agains State Rights
(...) Nothing. It's not a complicated point at all... we're governed by liars (Clinton "didn't inhale" and Bush "never did it"... right!... I beleive that!), surrounded by liars, are liars ourselves, and it's due to this stupid prohibition, just (...) (19 years ago, 11-Jun-05, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 3.015)

		Re: Iraq (was Re: Holy crap! (was Re: The partisian trap)
(...) And we discussed this before--and you added addendums to the idea of "whole people" to not include those that are too young, old, infirm, or mentally unstable. Did you also stop to consider that, in context of the day and age, that "whole (...) (21 years ago, 22-Oct-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 3.015)

		Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
(...) Yeah, really. It's hard to imagine how they could possibly know that the sister knows anything useful. I mean, do they have video footage of her seeing her sister do things? Not likely... Also, I believe in the right to remain silent -- to (...) (22 years ago, 22-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 3.015)

		Re: UN Gets it Right!
(...) I trust you do not mean that war crimes are constitutional? ;) (...) I'm sure many others would say Bush heading it would also be a "farce". After all, it is Bush's record on human rights which stopped him getting the ICC exemption extended. (...) (20 years ago, 24-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 3.015)

		Re: With Saddam's sons dead, now we just need to bag dad (Baghdad get it?)
(...) Y'know, I cannot recall a single instance before the administration of Shrub where the idea of detaining people in contravention of the most basic of all of our supposedly protected civil rights AND the idea of torturing them was part of every (...) (21 years ago, 24-Jul-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 3.015)

		Re: Question for the Conservatives out there
"Christopher Weeks" <clweeks@eclipse.net> wrote in message news:HzICys.15Iv@lugnet.com... (...) as if (...) The (...) same (...) I've definitely had some trouble with the origin of rights. They feel inherent, yet it also seems generally accepted (...) (20 years ago, 18-Jun-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 3.015)

		new covering
hi what do you think about this system of course we can have many modifications of this idea i suppose the best solution is to have the covering panel elastic (bendable) covering panel can be fixed by plate 1x1 round or other plates the special bush (...) (21 years ago, 8-Sep-03, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.technic)

all, rights
(score: 3.015)

		Re: Don Quixote puts away his lance (was Re: McDonalds set
(...) As with all these little morality puzzles, we don't have enough facts to conclude that. For all we know, Heinz skipped buying health insurance to cover the drug because he wanted to go bowling, or because he needed the money to pay his last (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 3.015)

		Re: War
(...) suffer. (...) only (...) if (...) still (...) Tough. I'd do it. We must be better than that. (...) I agree. I think I was nearly assaulted at work when an argument became heated and when I was called unamerican, I responded that they (the (...) (23 years ago, 5-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 3.015)

		Re: Is this an overreaction and a violation of rights?
(...) It is silliness. But it's like The Simpsons silliness--is fun! And if you're not careful about it, you may learn something about yourself :) I'm not all that introverted--I like going to parties and such, but by the end of an evening, I'm (...) (22 years ago, 24-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 3.015)

		Re: Liberterian comes through for the Bill of Rights (was a slur
(...) On the grounds that it may well be a flawed bill. I haven't found an article that cites which bill it is so it could be any of these: (from (URL) Bills from the 107th Congress ranked by relevance on"money laundering ". 42 bills containing your (...) (23 years ago, 12-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 3.015)

		Re: Oh wait--Rummy explains all in the 'sound bite' of the year...
(...) We sold them the goods. The goods have a shelf life. What weapons remained and were discovered were certainly no threat to the U.S. (...) Why should I have to repeat discussions that took place here a mere two months back? Do your own (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jun-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

all, rights
(score: 3.015)

		Re: National vote on handguns?
(...) "The Law" by Frederick Bastiat also covers some of this. For the full text of this AMAZINGLY concise and excellent work, see: (URL) I am sorry to go all "Scott Arthur" on y'all, but some of you really should read some of the primary texts (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 3.015)

		Re: One nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.
(...) I'd say that the actual start of our country is somewhat nebulous. I guess it feels good for us to say that it is 4 July 1776, but we had been effectively governing ourselves for some time at that point. Further, I think the adoption of the (...) (22 years ago, 2-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 3.015)

		Re: Government's role [Was: Re: What happened?]
(...) You were assuring me that this wonderful democracy works to protect the lives of the citizens, I think. You said "I was talking more of a constitutional democracy, where the people have certain rights (a.k.a. Bill of Rights) and protection (...) (25 years ago, 19-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 3.015)

		Zach's third LEGO auction (update 19) - almost done
All high bids made on or before 10/15/99 have advanced to GOING 1; those that were GOING 1/2 in the last update all have advanced to the next level. Welcome to my third RTL auction. It has been about 18 months since my last auction, time for (...) (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.auction)

all, rights
(score: 3.015)

		Zach's third LEGO auction (update 22) - last call
All high bids made on or before 10/24/99 have advanced to GOING 1; those that were GOING 1/2 in the last update all have advanced to the next level. Welcome to my third RTL auction. It has been about 18 months since my last auction, time for (...) (25 years ago, 29-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.auction)

all, rights
(score: 3.015)

		OH, I'll reply all right
due to the fact that I find using the web browser awkward, this is my THIRD attempt at typing this reply...... Steve said: (...) its always been: "what the game??" (...) With typical Steve-centric (tm) flare, I could expect something like "...that (...) (20 years ago, 24-Sep-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)

all, rights
(score: 3.015)

		Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
(...) The most damning part of this tale isn't given; was the woman sentenced or acquitted? (...) I appreciate your candor and your understanding of my skepticism. I still have trouble believing that the case could have been gagged or swept under (...) (22 years ago, 27-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

all, rights
(score: 3.015)

More: Next Page >>