|
| |
|  
memory
(score: 0.974)
|
|
 | | Re: legOS Network Protocol
|
| (...) Sounds good. Does it provide a stream interface or datagrams only? My faulty memory suggests that it might be the latter. If the network implementation supports packet reassembly (packets larger than MTU), there may not be a need for a stream (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
memory
(score: 0.974)
|
|
| | Re: fixed part: JW's parts
|
| (...) Excuse me? Not your problem? If I understand this correctly, Ryan is saying that the walls of the plate do not appear in LEdit when viewed at some angles/scales. If memory serves me correctly, LEdit is the primary modeling tool used in LDraw. (...) (26 years ago, 10-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
memory
(score: 0.974)
|
|
| | Bad Memory ? Help!!!
|
| Hi I trie to use the 62256BLP-10, instead of the 62256LP-120. And it didn´t work on the Handy board, but download program on the PC, said that the download was fine "Reboot the board", then I unplugged the Memory Chip, and tha same thing happend. (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jun-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| |
|
memory
(score: 0.974)
|
|
| | Re: Microfig Battlestar Galactica
|
| (...) Nope. At the time, the writing and acting was as good as anything else to come out the late 70's, but it does come across to a modern audience as fairly cheezy. On the other hand, by today's standards, everything written in the 70's is (...) (26 years ago, 7-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
|
memory
(score: 0.974)
|
|
| | Re: [ldraw.org] Shockwave Flash
|
| Tim, All you need is Macromedia's Flash. They do offer a demo for download that has a 30 day limitation. The actual program costs something like $250.00 (US) I think. I'm going on memory here. As for how it works, think of a timeline. Everything (...) (26 years ago, 11-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
memory
(score: 0.974)
|
|
| | power supply questions
|
| Hello all, I want to power the handy board using the 250watt 12V 9amp power supply of a PC. Any suggestions as to what I should take into consideration before attempting this. A buffer? A fuse? A straight hook up? Why is the HB not supposed to be (...) (26 years ago, 9-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| |
|
memory
(score: 0.974)
|
|
| | Microfig vs. Nanofig (Was: Nanofig Ties)
|
| (...) Pretty innovative models, but wouldn't a nanofig-scale one-man fighter be roughly one millimeter wide? I would say that the models you just posted are roughly in the same scale as previous microfig-scale models. It's my understanding that (...) (26 years ago, 9-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
memory
(score: 0.974)
|
|
| |
|
memory
(score: 0.974)
|
|
| | Re: part: technic pin long with stop bush
|
| (...) I am grinding my teeth. Jonathan, when you sent me this part originally, I pointed out several errors. Did you not believe me? That ring around the pin is a fatal flaw. And the stop bush on the end IS NOT just a Technic Stop Bush. It should (...) (26 years ago, 12-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
memory
(score: 0.974)
|
|
| | Re: loading s/w
|
| (...) The first instruction (at 03ae) places the stack in on-chip memory, assuming RAME bit of SYSCR is at its initial value of 1. Why not make rom_reset() disable interrupts, then do its thing? That would be the safest thing to do. -Kekoa (25 years ago, 21-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
memory
(score: 0.974)
|
|
| | Re: loading s/w
|
| (...) What sort of safety are you referring to? Motors left running? My initial thought was of lost memory or data structures in an indeterminate state, but that would seem to be moot since you are restarting from the ROM, which will have forgotten (...) (25 years ago, 20-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
memory
(score: 0.973)
|
|
| | Re: Programming RCX?
|
| Roland Kippenhan wrote: <snip> (...) My apologies to all Mac users. The slight was purely unintentional. When you get to be my age, the memory has lots of parity errors! - - - Nick - - - -- Did you check the web site first?: (URL) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
memory
(score: 0.973)
|
|
| | Re: LDraw part library structure
|
| (...) Most likely true. Just trying to be cautious. (...) Good clarification. Thanks for pointing that out. (...) Only if they are as concise, well-ordered and logical as Todd's. Mine always seem to be a rambling monologue. :-/ (...) And those (...) (25 years ago, 15-Apr-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
memory
(score: 0.973)
|
|
| | RE: LNP Repost
|
| Those are some really good points, but I am still concerned about the complexity and overhead of implementing IPC on the lego. Since resources are so limited it might just be easier to use shared memory and semaphores to communicate. On the other (...) (25 years ago, 17-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
memory
(score: 0.973)
|
|
| | Re: Novice group
|
| John VanZwieten skrev i meddelandet ... (...) technical for (...) are doing (...) technical (...) With the (...) more (...) Don't forget the CyberMaster! As it is a bit more limited than Mindstorms (mainly much less memory), most of the grand plans (...) (25 years ago, 21-Apr-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
memory
(score: 0.973)
|
|
| | RE: L3PB Problems
|
| Tamy (Mookie) wrote on Saturday, May 01, 1999 5:59 PM: (...) (garbled stuff removed) Thanks for the info. I noticed this too, just the other week. And I also got a mail from Terry, but I thought it only affected the Bounding Box comment, so I didn't (...) (25 years ago, 3-May-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
memory
(score: 0.973)
|
|
| | Re: Some comments (long)
|
| (...) Hmmm... I guess I have to explain every little word I write so as not to get flamed. People fear Java on a small memory platform because when they run a JVM for any length of time on their Wintel boxes they see it slowly "gobble" more and more (...) (25 years ago, 9-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
memory
(score: 0.973)
|
|
| | Re: legOS Network Protocol
|
| (...) The interface is specifically datagram only. Dunno about packet reassembly; I doubt it as the philosophy is minimalism. The main advantage I see in it is the ability to change the degree of checking it does on your behalf to ensure packets (...) (25 years ago, 20-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
memory
(score: 0.973)
|
|
| | Re: Something else is needed, I think...
|
| (...) I think the basic issue here is we have different ideas in what we want in this interpreted language. You seem to want something closer to the current bytecode, while I want something closer to Java/C++. Certainly if you lower the requirements (...) (25 years ago, 4-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
memory
(score: 0.973)
|
