|
 | | Re: How much memory finally?
|
| Thank for the answer, Dave, this is the kind of info I'm looking for. BUT! I don't think it is correct: 0x8000 is 32k: the firmware would start at the end of memory!?! 0xbfff is 48k: unless the 16k of the rom are counted of course... Then this mean (...) (25 years ago, 10-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|  
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Re: NQC Ignores based on your pbrink
|
| (...) Yes, I agree with the approach to using __RCX for conditional compile - that's really why its there. I had thought about adding some of the functions (SetSensor() etc.) as no-ops in the Scout API, but this really didn't feel right to me. I (...) (25 years ago, 8-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Re: balancing bot
|
| I recently implemented a new motor control "source" specifically targeted at PID algorithms in the new firmware. It takes a signed number in the range -128 to +128 and converts it into a motor control command. -128 to -1 is reverse direction and (...) (20 years ago, 31-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Re: RCX and train motors...
|
| (...) ... (...) ... (...) Add cars to the train. Then, the speeds will make more of a difference. If you're using the Swan firmware, you may have more control over the motor speed. I think there's a setting for power/break instead of the normal (...) (19 years ago, 14-Oct-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | talking RCX....
|
| do you remember how we all (ok me and Iain) talked about trying to get the RCX to play music with some ad hock midi-rcx converter thing??? well, ok maybe you don't.... look, I just found this super cool web page, and if you drill down deep enough (...) (22 years ago, 16-Oct-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Re: CPR for RCX?
|
| I don't know much about forth, but I'll try to help. I'm not sure that any firmware (normal) could keep the RCX from turning on. Try taking the batteries out, wait a few minutes, then put the same ones back in. If it turns on, it was the firmware. (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jun-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Re: Dropping your RCX on the floor...
|
| Yes, it was on, and when I picked it up, it was turned off. I thought "No! It's broken!" but you could turn it on, and the firmware was gone. But doesn't the batteries need to be disconnected for like a minute for the firmware to be erased from (...) (24 years ago, 7-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Trains, DCC, and pbForth
|
| All, As I've mentioned before, I have a version of pbForth firmware for the RCX that allows you to control trains modified with DCC controllers. The benefit of pbForth is that you can write, test, and debug your application interactively using (...) (21 years ago, 21-Nov-03, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Re: Flash Write Cycles
|
| (...) [...] (...) According to what I have read, putting the AT91SAM7S processor in system recovery mode (i.e., by resetting it via the hardware reset button or by programmatically putting it into firmware boot mode) loads SAM-BA into flash and when (...) (18 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | RE: RCX to RCX NQC
|
| There's another little problem that you may need to program around. There's a bug in the ROM firmware that could end up requiring a 30-millisecond delay between when a RCX sends out a message and when you should start sending the first character of (...) (19 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Re: NQC versus Lego RCX Code Speed
|
| (...) As I understand it, the situation is this: * Using the Windoze graphical environment - your 'programs' are translated into a special 'byte-code' that's interpreted by the RCX's firmware. * Using NQC, your C programs are translated into the (...) (24 years ago, 6-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Support for pbForth in BricxCC
|
| I've started a project recently related to pbForth. And I'm interested in some community feedback. Last night I wrote a preliminary pbForth syntax highlighter for the editor component I use in BricxCC. And I modified BricxCC slightly so that you can (...) (23 years ago, 3-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Firnware 2.0 and RCXCC
|
| Hi Everyone, Like the subject says, I am looking for some info on using the new firmware with RCXCC. Up until now, I have found the old version of NQC written by Mark Overmars to be more than enough for what I need. Just recently, though, I built a (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jul-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | leJOS & BricxCC news
|
| I have BricxCC compiling and downloading leJOS programs now. The support for leJOS is integrated in much the same way as BrickOS support is. BricxCC generates a Makefile and executes it using Bash. So GNU make and bash are required for it to (...) (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.java)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Re: RCX Virus?
|
| (...) Some more info about the problem: My RCX is 2.0 and I bought it 4-5 years ago. It's been on the shelf for a while (2-3 months) and I've always used rechargeable batteries. The ones I'm using now are 2000mA NiMH. I installed the firmware both (...) (18 years ago, 16-May-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Re: Salve 2
|
| (...) Ciao Stefano, benvenuto. Le torri sono compatibili con entrambi i tipi di RCX, nel senso che puoi usare una qualsiasi torre con un qualsiasi versione di firmware. La torre USB è autoalimentata, e ha i vantaggi di una connessione USB. Con (...) (24 years ago, 5-Feb-01, to lugnet.loc.it)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Re: Contest
|
| (...) It isn't! That's the real challenge!! :-) (...) I don't know if you intend to use the standard firmware, but in the CyberMaster I don't even have that choice. The CyberMaster and the PC were made to work as one. For one thing, without floating (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics.events, lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Re: FORTH editor/IDE
|
| (...) Yes, I forgot to turn it off after first downloading the firmware, and getting called away to do something else. Luckily they were rechargeables... (...) Thanks, I'll try it. I will be spending more time with FORTH over the next few weeks, (...) (26 years ago, 4-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
