|
 | | Re: Why NQC over Robolab?
|
| (...) I'm not very familiar with Robolab so I can't give you a direct comparison between the two. But I can say a few things about NQC that might help. With NQC you write programs in a more traditional style of programming (ala C, C++, C#, Java, (...) (20 years ago, 7-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|  
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | difference of generated code robolab<->NQC
|
| hi, i need to know if there is a difference between the code generated by Robolab and NQC. Both are running with the standard RCX Firmware, i also know that the compiled code of both is interpreted by the firmware. -> is the generated code the same (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | difference of generated code robolab<->NQC
|
| hi, i need to know if there is a difference between the code generated by Robolab and NQC. Both are running with the standard RCX Firmware, i also know that the compiled code of both is interpreted by the firmware. -> is the generated code the same (...) (24 years ago, 2-Dec-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Re: New RIK-user hints, bumpers, many topics
|
| (...) I don't much like C, but I used NQC as a means to an end because it uses the standard firmware. If I am going to have to go to the trouble of downloading new firmware then I'll go with FORTH (not just because I have a Jupiter Ace in the loft). (25 years ago, 16-Apr-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | NQC's future
|
| I'm very interested in hearing from NQC users what their needs/wishes are for future enhancements. Here's my current list of updates/enhancements that I am working on. 1. Built-in and documented Spybot API. 2. Fast firmware download via USB tower (...) (21 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc, lugnet.robotics.spybotics)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Re: LDCC and RCX gizmos (long)
|
| (...) Argh! Yes, you are right. I was asumimg that since the standard firmware can send arbitrary packets (that is right, isn't it?), it ought to be able to receive them as well. Time to consider alternate firmware. (21 years ago, 6-Sep-03, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Re: Programming the RCX
|
| (...) While I've tinkered a tiny bit with alternate firmwares (legOS and the Swan firmware) I almost exclusively use NQC. Considering the types of robots you're likely to build, there really are few situations where you need more power and speed (...) (19 years ago, 12-Apr-06, to lugnet.org.us.smart)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Re: Firnware 2.0 and RCXCC
|
| Hi Rob, You can get the original version of RCXCC to support the RCX2 firmware. The main change is to add the following line to your autoexec.bat: SET NQC_OPTIONS=-TRCX2 Of course, you also need the new firmware and a version of NQC that supports (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Re: Basic NQC Problem
|
| (...) They first came out with the release of the latest version of the firmware back in March 1999, but they are sadly not well documented, except in one place I know of... (...) ...in Dave's excellent *2nd* edition of this book, he dedicates (...) (19 years ago, 15-Nov-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | RE: NXC/NBC release news
|
| (...) In addition to the explicit flag on the opcodes, the NXT-G firmware also does an implicit clear of the screen the first time a user application program writes to the screen. So the macros could be hard-coded with 'false' and this parameter (...) (18 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | problems using arrays in NQC
|
| hi I'm building a lego turing machine and in the code certain data values need to be taken into an integer array. (sepcifically, inputing a binary no. using light sensor and a stack of yellow and black bricks). However, the program didn't compile (...) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | How much memory finally?
|
| I'm trying to figure out how much memory the RCX has. Many sources claims that it has - 16k rom - 16k ram for the firmware - 6k reserved for our own programs Does this mean the RCX has 22k of RAM memory? What an odd number... Also, when I perform (...) (25 years ago, 8-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | How much memory finally?
|
| I'm trying to figure out how much memory the RCX has. Many sources claims that it has - 16k rom - 16k ram for the firmware - 6k reserved for our own programs Does this mean the RCX has 22k of RAM memory? What an odd number... Also, when I perform (...) (25 years ago, 9-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Re: Programming Language for MS
|
| (...) A bit ambitious. (And not possible until the firmware is fully reverse-engineered, certainly.) You probably could get a java subset working, however. Luckily, you're not alone in all of this. Check out (URL) Matthew Miller ---> (...) (26 years ago, 7-Oct-98, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Re: using firmdl under win95
|
| I don't know about firmdl, but there's a firmware download utility as part of the rcxutil package for nqcc. Just grab the windows version of rcxutil for the executable, or grab the main source distribution if you want to build it yourself. Here's (...) (26 years ago, 2-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Newbie Question
|
| With all the talk about improving the 'add-on' software/firmware, has anyone attempted to add-on or upgrade the supplied software with the kit? If it's so limited, yet is a good design for newbies, can't it be improved so people that know how to use (...) (25 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Re: Some comments (long)
|
| At 18:22 06-05-1999 Thursday , you wrote: [...] (...) [...] Yes, that's a good idea since CyberMaster does accept a downloadable firmware, you can simply pretend it never existed and use all the CyberMaster specific opcodes as you wish. Laurentino (...) (25 years ago, 6-May-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
|
| | Re: legOS in cybermaster
|
| (...) Sorry Jose, it is NOT possible. The cybermaster firmware is in ROM and may not be overwritten in any way. Ciao Mario Web page: (URL) member page: (URL) member of ItLUG: (URL) (25 years ago, 22-Feb-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
firmware
(score: 1.778)
|
