 | | Re: Fully preemptive multitasking in native mode
|
|
(...) -Kekoa (27 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: I-Escrow service
|
|
(...) Sorry, but I am. It's rather steep too. 20 bucks or 5% of transaction face value, whichever is more. See my web pages for details. I do give discounts for sob stories or people I really like :-) (27 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| |
| | Re: Thanks to Terry Cruse and Ali V.
|
|
(...) The box car is a bit different since it has the bin inside... As for the engine design being the best... well, differences of opinion are what make horse racing interesting. I like it just about the LEAST. I would rank the 9v non steam engines (...) (27 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Newsgroup Gateway
|
|
(...) It somewhat defeats it, yes, but it's the only way to gateway things both ways so that people on one list don't have to sign up on the other list. The main purpose of the signup process is to stop the From-line abuse that was happening (you (...) (27 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Halloween buckets for sale
|
|
I still have some Halloween buckets for sale for $12 + shipping. I still have some left that were bought at full price, and once those are gone, I still don't plan on lowering the cost any. I bought all these buckets (well over 70 at reg and sale (...) (27 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| |
| | Re: more ROM info
|
|
(...) I passed over the 828c handler last night, and did a first pass over 14c0 in the process. The struct is really like this: struct { byte type; // sensor type, same as for set sensor type opcode byte mode; // sensor mode, same as for set sensor (...) (27 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Fully preemptive multitasking in native mode
|
|
Bonsoir mes collaborateurs, it is done. Sources and compiled demo on my RCX kernel page, (URL) bonne nuit! (27 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Newsgroup Gateway
|
|
Maybe you should make a subgroup, like lugnet.robotics.something, I don't have any name ideas, but this mailing list can easily overflow in the newsgroup. Also, this defeats the "signup to post" thingy you put on Nick/Ickna (27 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Newbie Question.. FAQ?
|
|
I am definitely in favor of this setting up a 2-way gateway between the lego-robotics mailing list and lugnet.robotics. I just went to work for a company that internally maintains thousands of mailing lists. However, they give people the option of (...) (27 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: list/group merge (was RE: Newbie Question.. FAQ?
|
|
(...) I think the word "build" on the front-end of the charter is a holdover from when the group was once called build.robotics before the renaming of the hierarchies. You're right, it's not really restricted to building. And on the (URL) page, it's (...) (27 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Newbie Question.. FAQ?
|
|
(...) Well, yes, that does seem to be how the list I described was organized... And it is a logical way to structure things, I think. Activities was definitely not a good word. (...) Sure, these are great questions to start with. Starting with ones (...) (27 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: list/group merge (was RE: Newbie Question.. FAQ?
|
|
(...) My only concern is that there is not enough traffic to warrant a split. Reverse engineering will die down after a few more months - the firmware is 95% finished as far as I'm concerned, with only the ROM and new firmware really remaining - (...) (27 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Thanks to Terry Cruse and Ali V.
|
|
(...) Wait! Wait! Let me toot that horn before you put it away. I picked up my last set (a 4543) on eBay just a couple weeks ago. (...) I'd have to say I like the Freight Rail Runner (4564) best. I like the engine design best of the three, and the (...) (27 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Bucket surgery
|
|
(...) With the hacksaw method, where you have to pull the crossbar out, yes. With my method of cutting the bar out while it is the bucket, no. It took me less than 30 seconds to turn my orange bucket into a trick or treat bucket for the kids. Rob (...) (27 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.storage)
|
| |
| | Re: LDAO suggestion
|
|
you can, when you run ldlite it should automatically set that up for you. it did for me Tore Eriksson wrote in message <3640D821.F4500199@m...net.se>... (...) Matt Marshall $%#$% Vacuum Cleaners Always get my pieces!!! Matt's Lego Page (URL) (27 years ago, 4-Nov-98, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Test from Cleveland
|
|
(...) I think a lot of people are either lurking or don't know about it yet (it's only a few weeks old). You might try posting to RTL and inviting more people over. I'm aware of 33 LEGO fans on-line who live in Ohio...must be at least 10 who could (...) (27 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.loc.us.oh.cle)
|
| |
| | Re: list/group merge (was RE: Newbie Question.. FAQ?
|
|
(...) Me too. (But am not opposed to supporting subdivisions should that eventually become necessary or desirable.) (...) Aw, no worries in my mind on that... Subscribers to lugnet.robotics via e-mail understand that they're subscribed to a (...) (27 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Test from Cleveland
|
|
I read this group. I'm in Columbus. :) --Mike. (...) (27 years ago, 4-Nov-98, to lugnet.loc.us.oh.cle)
|
| |
| | Re: Do your minifigs need a powerful front loader?
|
|
Fredrik Glöckner wrote in message ... (...) Great model. I am still trying to wrap my head around the full picture from the .dat's with missing parts... I'm slow, but will get it eventually. Looks like some great designing. How long did you work on (...) (27 years ago, 4-Nov-98, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Newbie Question.. FAQ?
|
|
(...) Maybe "activities" was the wrong word. (...) I envisioned Internals to be like an appendix. Nobody really want's to know about them except those people working at the lowest level, which is almost nobody. And maybe Internals also wasn't the (...) (27 years ago, 4-Nov-98, to lugnet.robotics)
|
