Subject:
|
Re: Thanks to Terry Cruse and Ali V.
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Thu, 5 Nov 1998 02:39:49 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpien@STOPSPAMMERSctp.iwantnospam.com
|
Viewed:
|
2643 times
|
| |
|
|
Rob Farver wrote:
>
> I'd have to say I like the Freight Rail Runner (4564) best. I like the
> engine design best of the three, and the hopper isn't too bad either.
> I also like the box car, though it is the same as in 4563.
The box car is a bit different since it has the bin inside...
As for the engine design being the best... well, differences of opinion
are what make horse racing interesting. I like it just about the LEAST.
I would rank the 9v non steam engines in this order:
4551
4563
4565
4558 alternate engine
4564
3225 alternate engine
--
Larry Pieniazek http://my.voyager.net/lar
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Thanks to Terry Cruse and Ali V.
|
| (...) Wait! Wait! Let me toot that horn before you put it away. I picked up my last set (a 4543) on eBay just a couple weeks ago. (...) I'd have to say I like the Freight Rail Runner (4564) best. I like the engine design best of the three, and the (...) (26 years ago, 5-Nov-98, to lugnet.trains)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
