 | | RE: NQC wishlist
|
|
(...) This might be a good idea. The pbForth thing is working out well too. Maybe a C to FORTH translator would be useful. In the other hand, making a custom bytecode interpreter means having to write the interpreter and support it on different (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: Swearing?
|
|
(...) Stop that! That offends me! <G,D,&R> It makes me think of that puking yellow happy face (YHF). The only thing that makes me feel better at that point is thinking of the YHF with a bleeding bullet hole in the forehead. -- | Tom Stangl, (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Year's Resolutions?
|
|
I resolve to build with the boys more and fuss at them less. And to use for building the space currently occupied by the Christmas tree - there's an incentive to get the thing taken down! -S (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: legofest o non legofest
|
|
"Giulio Ferrari" <giuliof@iol.it> wrote in message news:38723861.BA068C...@iol.it... (...) Ovviamente scherzavo. Marco ha iniziato il thread, quindi credo che (per questa volta) tocchi a lui decidere... altrimenti, se continuiamo così, la prossima (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Planning - Almost There
|
|
(...) (rereading what I wrote) Uh, durrr, that came out as hogwash, didn't it. I meant, if the pages that are created dynamically happen to come out the same as though they had been served statically (IOW, if it's static content generated (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Shopko now at 75% off plus Target
|
|
A lunch-break trip to the Shopko in Bountiful today revealed sets at up to 75% off. Here's a few that I can remember. 6975 Alien Avenger: $15.99 regular price $59.99. 2153 Robo-Stalker: $10.99 regular price $30? Adventurers blimps were $10.99. (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.loc.us.ut)
|
| |
| | Probably a stupid question...
|
|
...but did any of the saucer hull parts (translucent or solid) ever made it to the ldraw parts database? Thanks, KAPA (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: On the subject of gluing
|
|
MEK (or any other solvent for that matter) should stand up to soapy water. Solvents actually dissolve the plastic slightly, then the plastic re-solidifies after the solvent evaporates. In the end you don't have a 'glue' bond - you just have one (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC wish
|
|
Inline functions are by their very nature surpressed. Also, most control structures and calculations that can be evaluated at compile time are eliminated. I thought about surpressing tasks and subs, but then decided not to. The problem is that tasks (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: OMR Planning - Almost There
|
|
(...) Yes. That AND the sort of data you are fetching. In certain cases, a DB engine that has cached the results of queries, coupled with a requesting program that can use the results straightaway, can be faster than a raw filesystem, even if the (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC wishlist
|
|
(...) To me, one of the important features of such a thing would be compatibility with the existing firmware. Otherwise, why not just use LegOS? (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC wishlist
|
|
If anyone is seriously considering this I'd ask two things... 1) Have you considered porting the p-code interpreter used by Interactive C or something like a stripped down Java bytecode interpreter instead? The idea here would be that the RCX (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: New Model: The Devil's Gap
|
|
Me too! And then for filling out some survey, they sent me a coupon for $50 a $95 purchase. (...) 2 (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Scott Arthur?
|
|
I got mail bounced too...said disk quota exceeded. The address is the same I've used in the past. BTW: Scott, I got my package...thanks! Michael (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Return to Lego!
|
|
(...) caricabatterie durante il legofest ed essere eletto scemoricaricabile della festa :)) Marco (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: New Model: The Devil's Gap
|
|
(...) Hehe! I got the exact same stuff with that coupon! Jeff (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Update 9906
|
|
(...) Looks like both John and I mistakenly assumed that s\973s01.dat is the torso missing the front surface - in fact it is missing the back as well to cater for those rare torsos with decoration on the back. I sent a corrected version of 973p34 to (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Wizards
|
|
(...) Cool! I have many magic users in my land, with five distinct types: Blue Mages - 6 - Mostly Standard Majisto fare, but I have two or three without beards. They are general purpose spellcasters, but they only have access to attack and defense (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | BlockCAD version 2.1 is out!
|
|
Hi all! I'm happy to announce version 2.1 of BlockCAD, my LEGO building program! BlockCAD: (2 URLs) The big thing in this release is that pieces can be placed anywhere in X, Y and Z, not limited to a stud width/height increment anymore. This makes (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.build, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Scott Arthur?
|
|
(...) I've used that address many times, but not for the past 2 months. I've never had a problem. -Rob (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
