To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.robotics.rcxOpen lugnet.robotics.rcx in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / RCX / 345
344  |  346
Subject: 
RE: NQC wishlist
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc
Date: 
Tue, 4 Jan 2000 21:29:00 GMT
Viewed: 
5893 times
  
> If anyone is seriously considering this I'd ask two things...
> 
> 1) Have you considered porting the p-code interpreter used by Interactive
> C or something like a stripped down Java bytecode interpreter instead?
> The idea here would be that the RCX bytcodes are seriously crippled, and
> rather then hacking our way up the chain, why not start with something
> that was designed for more power up front.  Also with either solution
> you'd get ready-made tools with Interactive C or a Java compiler.

This might be a good idea. The pbForth thing is working out well too.
Maybe a C to FORTH translator would be useful. In the other hand,
making a custom bytecode interpreter means having to write the
interpreter and support it on different platforms. Dave has done
such  a good job of isolating the comms into their own class that he
makes it look easy. It's not.

The cool thing about pbForth is that the *brick* does the compilation
for you. No platform dependencies at all!

> 2) If you want NQC to support the extensions, *please* talk to me before
> starting work on them.  You'd basically be adding a new 'target' for NQC
> and I'd want to make sure its as consistent as possible with the three
> existing targets (RCX, CyberMaster, Scout).

Whatever happened to Scout programming? There was a flurry of excitement
a few weks ago, but then nothing. Is anyone actually programming their Scout?

Cheers,

Ralph Hempel - P.Eng

--------------------------------------------------------
Check out pbFORTH for LEGO Mindstorms at:
<http://www.hempeldesigngroup.com/lego/pbFORTH>
--------------------------------------------------------
Reply to:      rhempel at bmts dot com
--------------------------------------------------------



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: NQC wishlist
 
If anyone is seriously considering this I'd ask two things... 1) Have you considered porting the p-code interpreter used by Interactive C or something like a stripped down Java bytecode interpreter instead? The idea here would be that the RCX (...) (27 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx, lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)

9 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR