To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 13142
13141  |  13143
Subject: 
Re: Swearing?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Tue, 4 Jan 2000 21:33:53 GMT
Viewed: 
4725 times
  
Tony Priestman wrote:

> On Mon, 3 Jan 2000, Laura Gjovaag (<Pine.SUN.3.96.1000103105250.1332G-
> 100000@eskimo.com>) wrote at 18:56:39
> 
> > 
> > There is already regulation.  It's in the form of the Terms of Use that
> > you agreed to when you registered to post here.  If you think swearing is
> > ok, please go and re-read them.
> > 
> > The one you are looking for is in "DISCUSSION GROUP TERMS AND CONDITIONS",
> > item number 5, and the key words are "obscene", "vulgar", "profane", and
> > "indecent".
> 
> Define.
> 
> To quote in full:
> 
>  5.  Post or transmit any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous,
>        defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane, or indecent
>        information of any kind, including without limitation any
>        transmissions constituting or encouraging conduct that would
>        constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability, or
>        otherwise violate any local, state, national, or international
>        law.
> 
> Given the wide variety of religious, social and legal systems across the
> world, it becomes increasingly difficult to say anything other than
> 'Have a nice day' without offending *someone*.

Stop that!  That offends me!  <G,D,&R>

It makes me think of that puking yellow happy face (YHF).  The only thing that
makes me feel better at that point is thinking of the YHF with a bleeding
bullet hole in the forehead.


--
| Tom Stangl, Technical Support          Netscape Communications Corp
|      Please do not associate my personal views with my employer



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Swearing?
 
On Tue, 4 Jan 2000, Tom Stangl (<38726741.3242BBA0@...cape.com>) wrote at 21:33:53 (...) ARGHH! <thud> If there's one thing that ticks off us broad minded folks, it's people who are easily offended :-) (...) Hmmm... <bites tongue> (27 years ago, 5-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
  Re: Swearing?
 
Tom Stangl wrote in message <38726741.3242BBA0@n...pe.com>... (...) is (...) CONDITIONS", (...) that (...) Who watches the watchmen? -- Have fun! John The Legos you've been dreaming of... (URL) weird Lego site: (URL) (27 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Swearing?
 
On Mon, 3 Jan 2000, Laura Gjovaag (<Pine.SUN.3.96.1000...250.1332G- 100000@eskimo.com>) wrote at 18:56:39 (...) Define. To quote in full: 5. Post or transmit any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, (...) (27 years ago, 3-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)

473 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR