To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  *551473 (-20)
  Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
 
(...) Not to pick on you Felix (I would've voted for you in an ambassador contest or just about anything else your MOCs are so interesting ; ) but this line is worth responding to. Eurobricks is without representation despite, I'm told, many of (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
 
  Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
 
(...) I'll bite. This is a mixed question for sure. Product development and release of information are what need to be kept secret absolutely. The people who work on marketing plans and developing new things are dependant on the information not (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
 
  Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
 
Lenny, I can share what I made during the Billund design trip because I was granted permission by the Castle product design lead. At Brickworld 2007 I gave a presentation on fan involvement in the design process. Currently I am working on an online (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
 
  Re: Sticker Generator for LDRAW / MLCAD
 
(...) There is C code for a point in polygon implementation here: (URL) only 8 lines of code for the whole thing, but it supports arbitrary polygons, including ones with holes. UNDERSTANDING the algorithm might take a little work, but the page (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
 
(...) I agree communities should choose who represents them. But if it was based on a voting system imagine what would happen; Would people start going to forums and campaigning-- or worse, mudslinging to get votes? I can see that getting really (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
 
  Re: Old lorry
 
(...) Yes, I sent you an email (adress as seen here on LUGNET) and added it also to the BS-folder of the model. For anyone, who will have a look at it: it is not meant for an instruction, so the submodels and steps seem to be a little stupid (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.modelteam, FTX)
 
  Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
 
(...) Let me say that I understand your sentiment and your frustration. My aim here is to outline some of the issues that make it difficult to do what seems obvious. Big part of the secrecy issue is actually figuring out what must be kept secret and (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)  
 
  Re: Sticker Generator for LDRAW / MLCAD
 
Sorry that it has taken me so long. In fact, I am still working on creating quadrilaterals and triangles to fill the largest spaces possible. My main hang-ups are: reducing processing time a working point-in-polygon test I have found two different (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.cad)
 
  Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
 
(...) While I agree and reiterate Dave's points, I think that LEGO sees the ambassador program a bit differently. They are not LEGO employees assigned as ambassadors to the AFOL community. I believe LEGO sees them as AFOL members assigned as (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
 
  Re: Alternate NXT-Firmware flashing tools
 
Hi Christian, (...) you could add some code in lowlevel.c to dump the USB packets, and then look if you see anything wrong. Jürgen (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt.nxthacking)
 
  Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
 
(...) Just a point here. I think this is part of why the Ambassadors got that "Unbassador" logo that I'm sure everyone has seen floating around. Here's a perfect example of something that you could have shared with the community, but didn't and (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX) !! 
 
  Re: MOCpages? Brickshelf? What should I do?
 
(...) Hi Sean, and thank you for MOCPages. (...) Basically, I trust people. I trust people from the start. But who runs MOCPages? You and you alone? Not a team? Without the ldraw.org team, Ldraw would have died with Jesse. And that's basically the (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.publish, FTX)  
 
  Re: Community Donations
 
(...) Hi John & John, thank you very much for the donation, I've received two more the same day but don't know whether the donors would like being identified in public. In case that some of you wonder: LUGNET received around net Euro 2400 over the (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.finance, FTX)
 
  Re: 7996 Dual Crossover Available from US S@H
 
(...) Quoted from <http:\www.brickish.org Brickish Assocation> member James Shields "I also got the new RC crossover points. They are interesting, but not quite as good as I hoped. Earlier reports suggested that the switch was a 3-way affair, but it (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
 
  [FreeLUG : French Enthusiast LEGO(c) User Group] Les nouveautés mercredi 25 juillet 2007
 
Bonjour Voici la lettre d'information du site "FreeLUG : French Enthusiast LEGO(c) User Group" ((URL) lettre recense les articles et les brèves publiés depuis 1 jours. Nouveaux articles ---...--- ** Fana'Briques 2007 : une touche de bleu ** par (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.org.fr.freelug)
 
  Re: Stealth gunship
 
(...) Hi Magnus, Indeed, camouflage is harder to do on a small model with complex shapes. Large flat areas are relatively easy. In that case limiting the number of colours is a good idea. That simplifies matters somewhat. I agree that certain parts (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.build.military)
 
  Re: New military aircraft: F-117A Stealth fighter and Su-27 Flanker
 
(...) I spent a lot of time on getting the shape right, and reading this I guess I succeeded fairly nicely. I do think that the studs were a bit of a give-away as to what is the LEGO version. (...) Thanks. I appreciate it, Ralph (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.build.military)
 
  Re: New military aircraft: F-117A Stealth fighter and Su-27 Flanker
 
(...) Thanks. (...) You've got a keen eye. Yes, they rotate through a full 180 degrees. It's not quite the way it works on the real aircraft, but indeed there simply wasn't any room otherwise. (...) Thanks. For some odd reason it doesn't always turn (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.build.military)
 
  Re: LEGO Ambassadors Status Report - Summer 2007
 
(...) That's still a little vague. I just think if the ambassadors are going to complain in the name of the community, the community should get a say in what they complain about. Personally, I think it'd be better to take just a couple of the (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.ambassadors, FTX)
 
  Re: NEW VERSION! Re: Conversion file for ldraw to ldd
 
(...) Verified and made a brand new XML with only parts that are in the current LEGO factory parts, and they must work in the conversion both ways (LDD > LDR > LDD). (URL) have not attempted to do any of the minifig stuff. And others are missing but (...) (17 years ago, 26-Jul-07, to lugnet.cad.ldd)

Skipped 2 messages in group lugnet.off-topic.debate (Skip-filter settings)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR