 | | Re: Elenco iscritti ItLUG, adeguamento normativo ed una proposta
|
|
Ciao, anche se lurko tanto e partecipo pochissimo, sono d'accordo anch'io, sia per la questione della privacy che quella riguardante la quota. Salutoni Paolo (19 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
(...) Well I agree it is a little misleading even with the little pic with the red X, but I still think there's a pretty good selection of parts for the price. I really hope the cost to Aus isn't 1.5x the cost to the US like most sets on S@H though. (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | [Press Release] 2nd BayLUG Meeting of February
|
|
For Immediate Release Contact: Russell Clark rclark@telis.org 408.605.5412 (cell) SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, CA - The Bay Area LEGO Users Group (BayLUG) is pleased to announce the details of our second meeting this month. The meeting will be held on (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.org.us.sacbb, lugnet.org.us.baylug, lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf, lugnet.loc.us.ca.sac)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
(...) So, how many models can be made from this set at the same time, or are we paying $100 for one engine model? -- Don (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!
|
|
It looks similar to Jim's (with a different model), but here's a screenshot: (URL) It appears that we compiled with different versions of QT; Jim's border around the graphics area is different, as is the toolbar area. I didn't mention it in my (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!
|
|
Thanks for doing that, Jim. Just as a note, the latest development code compiles and runs on Mac OS X without modification, and LDView 3.2 will have an official Mac Universal Binary version (although it might labeled as Beta). (Getting the Universal (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac, FTX)
|
| |
| | LDView 3.1 on Mac OS X!
|
|
Hi, everyone. I'm extremely pleased to announce that I've managed to compile (URL) LDView 3.1> on Mac OS X! Previously, I believe only (URL) version 1.0> was publicly available. Allow me to submit this piping-hot screenshot as evidence for your (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.dev.mac, lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | I would like to trade SeaWorld tickets for Legoland tickets
|
|
I would like to trade two of my employer-provided SeaWorld passes for two adult Legoland passes with someone at the California Legoland. My one-day passes are valid at any of the three SeaWorlds, two Busch Gardens, Sesame Place or the Williamsburg (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
(...) $100 for 1080 pieces, or a little under 10 cents per piece, seems to be a pretty typical price point.for sets. Since the motors are going for $20 through Factory, that would tack another $20 onto the price of the set...or require dropping (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
(...) Actually, the verbage on the NA box appears in English of course, but also in French and Spanish in smaller caracters. The verbage on the IN box appears in 12 languages, including English, French, Spanish, German, Italian, Dutch... (I will not (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
(...) Too bad... for 100USD (100EUR here in the old world) it should have a motor... with no motor this set gets too pricey. And I also think that the main image, picturing a motor, is misleading. I'm a bit disappointed. G. (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
"Gianluca Morelli" <poldoshop@yahoo.it> wrote in message news:JDoyM7.EJH@lugnet.com... (...) The motor is not included in the box. Look closely at this image: (URL) the lower right hand corner there is a picture of a 9v train motor and some track. (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
What about the motor? The swiss crocodile looks motorized, but there's no motor in the parts list... (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Working Theme Park Ride: Enterprise
|
|
(URL) The "Enterprise" is a ride seen in many theme parks. It consists of a wheel with passenger cars along its edge. During the ride, the wheel spins and is raised up to the vertical. It has seating for 24 mini-figs and is painted as "The (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.technic, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
"Mike Walsh" <mike_walsh@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:JDowF1.G1y@lugnet.com... (...) I will go ahead and pre-answer one question which I am pretty sure someone will pose: Q: Why are their two versions of the box? A: Like many LEGO sets, (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
ILTCO has received some images of the new 10183 LEGO Hobby Train. (URL) you are not familiar with the LEGO Hobby Train (aka UTB), you can read some background information in this thread: (URL) first public announcement of the 10183 LEGO Hobby Train (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Two motors at the same time... It is possible?
|
|
(...) Or maybe just wrap the calls inside a mutex, so at least the behaviour is defined, if not optimum. Many of the NBC/NXC macros do exactly that, maybe all of them should? ROSCO (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Two motors at the same time... It is possible?
|
|
(...) I understand his confusion. Not allowing separate threads to call the same subroutine is certainly unexpected. The concept of "thread" conventionally involves separate stacks for local variables (and a shared global state -- unlike separate (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Two motors at the same time... It is possible?
|
|
(...) It is possible. The NXC API doesn't currently wrap this capability in a really simple function. (...) The RotateMotor API function calls a subroutine written in NBC that does not return until the tachometer limit target has been reached. (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: LSynth NXT cable segment
|
|
(...) The simplest answer is to stretch a cylinder to approximate the shape of the NXT cable. Kevin (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
