 | | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
|
(...) actuly the ironic thing is lego is producing something like you described for the 2007 lineup. the dinosar and grader have an ir motor controler with a seperate motor and battery pac. the only down side is it's uncompatable with the old 9v (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
Rene, Can you please choose to murfle (URL) The embedded graphic contains language that can be considered profane and is risque in terms of LUGNET's family friendliness. Somehow the site does not read the text contained in images. ;-) Kevin, while I (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
 | | NXC/NBC beta news
|
|
Sourceforge has disabled shell access for the next several days so I am not able to upload files or make changes to html on the NBC or BricxCC site. I can, however, upload files to the standard sourceforge release page. So for the time being I will (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
 | | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
|
(...) another hypothetical here: If lego or someone else was to produce a motor that matched the pulling power or was stronger than the current 9v motor and there was a system in place to suport the amp draw would that have any affect on your (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
 | | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
|
(...) Again, I am someone who will never convert to the plain plastic, but I see the IR system being much more useful if the battery/receiver is unbundled from the baseplate. Ideally, I would like to have the IR receiver unbundled from both battery (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
 | | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
|
(...) Not gonna happen until TLG brings out a motor that can handle remotely near the current motor, and maybe not even then. I already have too much money spent on rechargeable batteries, I'm not about to attempt to power a decent train with a (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
 | | Engraved Fonts
|
|
I was just wondering if there would be a market for 1x1 bricks engraved with letters and numbers. I was thinking of creating a set of 100 --could be on white, blue, red, yellow brick with choice of color for letters. If any interest, what would be a (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
| |
 | | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
|
(...) OK, well one really simple, almost trivial thing: you can run the IR train on the same track as the 9V, allowing you to have two trains going around a track in different directions, with just a quick timed siding excursion to let them pass and (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
|
(...) Before this goes way off on a tangent let me rephrase my question. What changes would you propose to the IR/RC train system to make it useful in a complementary way to the 9v system? I understand that some will never convert as they have (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
|
[Warning: non-train person elbowing into the conversation, so my viewpoint is... very different perhaps] (...) There are two issues I see being important for me: control and power (and yes, I know lots of reasons why it's best to do that through (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
 | | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
|
(...) Personally, I'd use the plastic gray track rails before I'd use the plastic track compatible with the 9 volt track. I suppose it would be easy for TLG to make gentler curves using pieces such as those, but the point is mute for me. I'm with (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
|
(...) Changes... NONE!! I have too much invested in 9v trains to convert to RC and plastic track. It is my belief that who can say in the next few years that TLG won't switch to another train line. They have gone from pre-- to 4.5v, to 12v, 9v and (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
 | | Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
|
Id like to pose a question thats been bothering me lately. Since RC trains made theyre debut last year many issues have risen with the product in its current form. Mainly these are control and power issues but there are many other quirks as well. (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
 | | Re: Which glue?
|
|
(...) For plastics, I'd recomend "GOOP" over silicon adhesive. It has a small amount of solvent to adhere to plastic, and sets faster. The stuff is like a hybrid of Silicon and rubber cement. As for CA (superglue), the fumes are nearly as dangerous (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.parts.mod)
|
| |
 | | Re: Bluetooth Comm Problem
|
|
Glad we could help Ralph. And I'm sure there will be many great discussions in here as there already have been. (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
 | | Re: The Unofficial LEGO Advanced Building Techniques Guide
|
|
(...) It is true that UBT does not update anymore, but one of its contributor is now involved in (URL) The Brothers Brick>. The content from UBT will also be ported to that blog (if it hasn't already). TBB mainly highlights good mocs, but we also do (...) (19 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.build.schleim, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
(URL) (19 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: The Unofficial LEGO Advanced Building Techniques Guide
|
|
(...) Didier, this is a fantastic piece of work - even better since the last time I saw it. I'm terribly sorry in case you tried to reach me again; way back when I slipped of the 'net, my e-mail also went haywire and I completely forgot about this. (...) (19 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.build.schleim)
|
| |
 | | Re: Elenco iscritti ItLUG, adeguamento normativo ed una proposta
|
|
(...) Concordo ma riconosco anche che la nuova legge sulla Privacy impone delle regole a cui dobbiamo attenerci. Inoltre se non sbaglio chiunque poteva prendere i nostri dati ed utilizzarli per altri scopi !! (...) Se ne era già parlato in varie (...) (19 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
 | | Re: BrickJournal Issue 6 is OUT!
|
|
(...) Oops. Thanks for the fix! Joe (19 years ago, 16-Feb-07, to lugnet.publish.brickjournal, FTX)
|